James McGirr Kelly

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania district Deceased · served 1983–2005 Appointed by Ronald Reagan (Republican) 20 signed orders read

Judge Kelly no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Baskin & Sears, P.C.
· 1997-03-14
Bankruptcy appeal (United States) Granted

“the appropriate course upon this appeal is to vacate the Final Order of the bankruptcy court and remand this matter to allow the bankruptcy court to apply the proper burden of proof”

Adams v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
95-CV-8088 · 1996-05-07
Motions to strike (United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) Granted

“Plaintiffs' surreply, entitled Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Reply in Opposition to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss [Docket Entry 8], is STRICKEN;”

Motions to dismiss (United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) Granted

“Plaintiffs' Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiffs may file, on or before June 7, 1996, an amended complaint of employment discrimination against the head of the DLA under Title VII, the ADEA, and the Rehabilitation Act;”

Motions to dismiss (United States Defense Logistics Agency) Granted
Scott Paper Co. v. United States
· 1996-08-12
Discovery appeal (United States) Denied

“The Memorandum of Decision and Order of the United States Magistrate Judge, dated June 25, 1996 [Docket Entry 24], is AFFIRMED;”

Samuels v. Acme Market
· 1994-02-18
Motions to dismiss (Resolution Trust Corporation) Granted

“Trust Corporation is GRANTED. The complaint is DISMISSED as to all defendants.”

Scarinci v. Ciccia
· 1995-03-02

Kelly entered findings and judgment after a bench trial on an employee-benefits claim; because the writing did not decide a motion, it is retained as reasoning evidence but excluded from motion statistics.

Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.
· 1993-08-03
Summary judgment (The Home Indemnity Company) Denied

“The Home Indemnity Company's Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiffs is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (Pacific Employers Insurance Company) Denied

“PEIC's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Policy No. XMO 01 1108 against Plaintiffs is DENIED.”

In re Comcast Cellular Telecommunications Litigation
· 1996-12-06
Motions to remand (plaintiffs) Denied

“For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be DENIED.”

United States v. Holland
· 1993-10-13
Motions to dismiss (Darnell Holland) Denied

“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Count Two is denied.”

Scoles v. Mercy Health Corp.
· 1994-12-08
Summary judgment (Paul Scoles, M.D.) Denied

“Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED;”

Summary judgment (Mercy Health defendants) Granted

“Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED;”

Seeney v. Kavitski
· 1994-10-12
Motions to dismiss (Commonwealth defendants) Granted in part

“Accordingly, Counts I and XIII are dismissed completely against the Commonwealth defendants. Moreover, plaintiff may not seek monetary relief against any of the Commonwealth defendants based on Counts VI, VII, X or XI. In addition, the plaintiff may not seek injunctive relief under these counts against the Commonwealth or its agencies. However, plaintiff may proceed against the defendant Zazyczny in his official capacity, for injunctive relief only, based on Counts VI, VII, X and XI.”

Servicemaster Co., L.P. v. FTR Transport, Inc.
· 1994-09-07
Summary judgment (FTR Transport, Inc.) Granted

“Accordingly, summary judgment must be granted to FTR on ServiceMaster’s claim for broker liability.”

Motion for sanctions (FTR Transport, Inc.) Denied

“Accordingly, FTR’s motion will be denied.”

Giorno v. Temple University Hospital
· 1995-01-03
Summary judgment (American Red Cross) Granted

“this court ORDERS that the Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED and Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiff.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Eight confirmed Kelly cases filed from 1985 through 1987 were sampled across contract, interstate-commerce, employee-benefits, civil RICO, personal-liability, lease, civil-rights, and insurance matters. All were terminated, but none had an electronic entry stream, so this bounded historical sample does not support career-wide caseload, duration, motion-outcome, or timing claims.

A historical record

Judge Kelly no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.