Emanuel Mac Troutman

How Judge Troutman rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Troutman no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1967–2004
Appointed by
Lyndon B. Johnson (Democratic)
Commissioned
1967-06-16
Education
Dickinson College, A.B., 1934; Dickinson School of Law, LL.B., 1936
Signed orders read
20

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Terry v. Mathews
· 1976-11-09
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“we have no alternative but to remand the record for the appointment of a duly qualified vocational expert.”

Scanlan v. United States Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
· 1976-11-09
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“These circumstances compel us to remand for the reasons stated.”

Kulhavick v. Mathews
· 1976-11-09
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“The Court remanded the record for reconsideration in accordance with the proper test. We shall do likewise.”

Birmingham v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
· 1977-01-13
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“we have no choice but to remand the record for further consideration in accordance herewith.”

Martin v. Califano
· 1977-06-27
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Cross-motions for summary judgment will be denied and the record remanded.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied
Martinez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
· 1978-02-13
Class certification (plaintiff) Denied

“For the reasons cited herein, we will deny plaintiffs motion to certify this action as a class action and we will grant defendant’s motion to dismiss the claim under § 1981 and to strike plaintiff’s demand for a jury trial.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted
Motion to strike jury demand (defendant) Granted
Gordon v. Califano
· 1978-03-22
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“we shall, in the interest of justice, remand the record for that purpose and for such additional evidence as may be relevant.”

Garrity v. Califano
· 1979-10-04
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“Accordingly, we shall remand the record for further consideration in accordance herewith.”

Warhola v. Harris
· 1981-03-23
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be granted and defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be denied.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied
Lopresti v. Schweiker
· 1981-08-06
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“We shall grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and deny defendant’s motion for summary judgment.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied
Murphy v. Schweiker
· 1981-10-05
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“We shall grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and deny defendant’s motion for summary judgment.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied
Mihalsky v. Schweiker
· 1982-06-08
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be granted and the defendant’s like motion will be denied.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Twenty historical assigned cases were located in the enumerated slice, but the sampled records did not provide usable motion timelines. This bounded holding does not support claims about Troutman's career caseload, motion base rates, case duration, or ruling speed.

A historical record

Judge Troutman no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.