Chad Francis Kenney Sr.

How Judge Kenney rules, drawn from 35 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Position
District judge
Appointed by
Donald Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
October 24, 2018
Education
Villanova University, B.A., cum laude; Temple University Beasley School of Law, J.D.
Signed orders read
35

About Judge Kenney

Chad Francis Kenney, Sr. is a judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Appointed by President Donald J. Trump, Judge Kenney received a commission on October 24, 2018.

Judge Kenney's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Kenney, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Contacting chambers

Do not email chambers about substantive matters.

“Parties should not email Chambers on substantive matters.”

Motions

Limit supporting briefs or memoranda to 25 pages unless the court grants leave.

“limited to twenty-five pages. If a party requires more than twenty-five pages to explain its position”

Conferences

File the Rule 26(f) report at least three business days before the pretrial conference.

“At least three business days before the pretrial conference, counsel shall file on the docket the required report of the Rule 26(f) meeting.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Kenney decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In this case, he denied the defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and dismiss the action.

“upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss The Case (ECF No. 11) ... it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion (ECF No. 11) is DENIED.”

Cautions

In this case, he granted the dispositive motion, dismissed all counts with prejudice, and directed the clerk to close the case.

“it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The matter is therefore DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE on all counts. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.”

In Pennmark, the proposed expert lacked qualifying retail-contract expertise and offered unreliable or legal opinions throughout his reports. The court rejected the fallback request to trim only isolated paragraphs and excluded the reports and testimony in full.

“The Court cannot simply fix the admissibility and reliability problems it has identified by excising paragraphs from his Reports or by ordering him not to provide any testimony on certain topics.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Ceasar v. Corizon Health, Inc.
2:21-cv-01643 · 2022-02-07
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The matter is therefore DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE on all remaining counts.”

Shooter Pops LLC d/b/a Claffey's Frozen Cocktails v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
2:22-cv-04630 · 2023-01-05
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The matter is therefore DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE on all counts. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.”

Kittrell v. Smith
2:23-cv-00811 · 2023-11-21
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“upon consideration of Defendants UPMC Altoona and Dr. Yaquob Tokhi’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 35), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is instructed to terminate Defendants UPMC Altoona and Dr. Yaquob Tokhi.”

Sargent v. School District of Philadelphia
2:22-cv-01509 · 2024-10-11
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 86) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to CLOSE this case.”

Volz v. General Motors, LLC
2:22-cv-03471 · 2023-10-05
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 24) and Defendants’ Response in Opposition (ECF No. 34), it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED.”

Kearney v. Ironridge, Inc.
2:23-cv-04505 · 2024-05-14
Motion to compel arbitration (defendant) Denied

“upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss The Case (ECF No. 11) ... it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion (ECF No. 11) is DENIED.”

Johnson v. Superintendent McGinely
2:19-cv-01244 · 2021-11-10
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED; 3. The petition for stay and abeyance is DENIED AND DISMISSED; 4. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue”

Abadi v. Target Corporation
2:22-cv-02854 · 2023-10-13
Judgment on pleadings (defendant) Granted

“For the reasons set forth above, Target's motion is granted, and Abadi's PHRA claim is dismissed with prejudice.”

Brown v. United States Postal Service Domestic Claims
2:23-cv-02554 · 2024-04-10
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the United States has not consented to be sued for misdelivery of mail, so Plaintiff's claim is barred by sovereign immunity. ... since the case has been dismissed, there are no grounds for Plaintiff to engage in discovery.”

United States v. Andre Williams
2:24-cr-00038 · 2024-09-09
Motion to dismiss indictment (defendant) Denied

“upon consideration of the Defendant's Amended Motion to Dismiss the Indictment (ECF No. 28) ... it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion is DENIED. ... this application of 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) 'fits within our Nation's history and tradition of disarming those persons who legislatures believed would, if armed, pose a threat to the orderly functioning of society.'”

Jefferson v. Abington Memorial Hospital
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Court will dismiss the identified claims without prejudice.”

Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund v. GSK PLC
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“with prejudice because any attempt to cure the pleading deficiency would be futile”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

  • Judge Kenney has served since October 2018 and sits in the Philadelphia and Allentown divisions.
  • His civil docket includes securities class actions, employment and civil-rights cases, insurance and benefits disputes, consumer-credit and copyright matters, wage claims, personal injury, immigration mandamus, prisoner litigation, and habeas petitions.
  • Many cases end through settlement or failure-to-prosecute dismissals rather than a merits ruling.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months1
Civil cases pending more than three years2
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202602
Sep 202520
Mar 202501
Sep 202401
Mar 202407
Sep 202325
Mar 202385
Sep 202200
Mar 202201
Sep 202112
Mar 202102
Sep 202002

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, not for Judge Kenney: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed5,7305.1 months
Closed with no court action1,9523.2 months
Closed before pretrial2,8344.7 months
Closed during or after pretrial89810 months
Closed during trial4617.8 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20255,7305.1 months
Sep 20246,2004.6 months
Sep 20236,5957 months
Sep 20225,2216.6 months
Sep 20215,2456.5 months
Sep 20204,6865.7 months
Sep 20195,3746 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Kenney with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Kenney, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Kenney's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace