James Alger Fee

How Judge Fee rules, drawn from 22 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Fee no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon
Position
district
Status
Elevated to a higher court
Served
1931–1954
Appointed by
Herbert Hoover (Republican)
Commissioned
1931-12-23
Education
Whitman College, A.B. (1910); Columbia Law School, LL.B. (1914)
Signed orders read
22

How Judge Fee decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A concrete, severable dispute and a practical need to settle the parties' rights supported retaining a declaratory action despite the court's caution about federal jurisdiction.

“The positions of the two parties are adverse.”

When critical records were under one party's control and disappeared, the court treated a finding in the opponent's favor as an appropriate discovery remedy.

“The records demanded were all under defendant’s control. The intention of defendant could only be shown thereby.”

Procedural preferences

The court required requests for special service of process to identify the individual to be appointed and explain that person's qualifications.

“it is proper for the attorney desiring service to be so made to file a motion for designation of a particular individual, setting forth his qualifications”

Recorded pretrial admissions were treated as binding because effective pretrial procedure depends on the court's ability to rely on counsel's representations.

“If the court cannot rely upon the admissions of counsel made in pretrial conferences, then that procedure has no validity.”

Cautions

A stipulated judgment still required an actual controversy and an adequate factual foundation, especially where the result could affect interests beyond the named parties.

“the court has jurisdiction to refuse to enter judgment upon a stipulation which does not set out facts.”

Military service did not automatically stay a civil case; the court looked for concrete prejudice and retained authority to halt proceedings if that prejudice later appeared.

“The court can under the statute halt the case at any time whenever manifest injury to the soldier appears.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Mitchell
· 1948-07-22
Petition for seaman wages (seaman) Granted in part

“The Clerk will pay to claimant $574.78 and to the Treasury of the United States for the fund $1300.00.”

Claim for maintenance (shipowner) Denied

“The Court denies the claim of the steamship company altogether, since there is no authority in law for such recompense.”

In re Platt
· 1947-02-03
Petition to review referee order (United States) Granted

“The claim of the United States must be allowed because no other solution squares with this axiom of bankruptcy law.”

Aaker v. Kaiser Co.
· 1947-10-13
Motions to remand (plaintiffs) Denied

“Remand to the state court refused.”

United States v. De Maurez
· 1943-07-12
Motion to correct sentence (defendant) Denied

“The present petition containa no new ground nor contention and, therelore, even if properly filed it would be denied.”

Modric v. Oregon & N. W. R.
· 1938-09-30
Application for special service (applicant) Denied

“The present application is therefore denied.”

United States ex rel. Federal Housing Administration v. Jackson
· 1938-09-30
Motion for entry of default (plaintiff) Granted

“the court grants the motion and enters the default.”

In re Universal Bond & Mortgage Corp.
· 1939-01-03
Motion to intervene (Securities and Exchange Commission) Granted

“The petition is granted.”

Food Machinery Corp. v. Guignard
· 1938-12-05
Motion to shorten time (plaintiff) Denied

“Since service of process on persons within the boundaries of this state is sought in the instant proceeding, the court has no power to cut short the time for answer.”

Atlantic Lumber Corp. v. Southern Pacific Co.
· 1942-10-26
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“The order will be that the ‘first cause of action’ contained in the second amended complaint is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to United States .of America and Interstate Commerce Commission. This claim is dismissed as to Southern Pacific Company because by the election of plaintiff to bring proceedings before the Interstate Commerce Commission, the order of that body was final and the claim cannot be re-litigated before this court.”

In re Grants Pass Irrigation District
· 1940-05-20
Motions to dismiss (objecting creditors) Denied

“The motion to dismiss is overruled.”

Swiderski v. Moodenbaugh
· 1942-03-23
Motions to stay (defendant) Denied

“The court overrules the motion to postpone further proceedings for the duration of the emergency.”

Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Strauss & Co.
· 1940-12-02
Motion for judgment as discovery sanction (plaintiff railroad) Granted

“Therefore, the plaintiff was entitled to judgment or a finding that the intention of defendant as to the grain contained in each car was as plaintiff alleged.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Fee's reported District of Oregon decisions include bankruptcy, removal, interpleader, condemnation, railroad-rate, labor, maritime, and criminal matters. No electronic records are available to quantify his caseload.

A historical record

Judge Fee no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.