Anna J. Brown

How Judge Brown rules, drawn from 7 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Oregon
Position
district
Appointed by
Bill Clinton (Democratic)
Commissioned
1999-10-26
Education
Portland State University (B.S., 1975); Northwestern School of Law of Lewis & Clark College (J.D., 1980)
Signed orders read
7

How Judge Brown decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Cautions

Grants summary judgment or dismissal where a federal statute supplies no private right of action or does not apply to the contracts at issue (e.g. ELIHPA, the interstate probation compact), dismissing the federal claims with prejudice and remanding pendent state claims.

“the Court GRANTS Federal Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#82) and GRANTS DBSI and Northwest Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#70). The Court DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiffs' First, Second, and Third Claims and REMANDS Plaintiffs' remaining state-law claims to state court.”

Dismisses claims against a U.S. parent for a separately-incorporated, financially-insulated foreign subsidiary's conduct where the plaintiff fails to allege facts supporting parent liability under Oregon law, offering to convert to summary judgment before dismissing with prejudice.

“For these reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#5) and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Goldammer v. Veneman
3:03-cv-01749-BR · 2005-05-26
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Federal Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#82) and GRANTS DBSI and Northwest Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#70). The Court DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiffs' First, Second, and Third Claims and REMANDS Plaintiffs' remaining state-law claims to state court.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Federal Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#82) and GRANTS DBSI and Northwest Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#70).”

Shaw v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
3:08-cv-01013-BR · 2009-03-20
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“For these reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#5) and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.”

Clavette v. Persels
3:13-cv-00058-BR · 2013-11-04
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion (#22) for Summary Judgment, GRANTS Defendant's Motion (#31) for Summary Judgment, and DISMISSES Plaintiff's remaining claims with prejudice.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted
Lee v. Columbia Collection Services, Inc.
3:13-cv-02033-ST · 2015-02-23
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#62) and, therefore, DENIES Defendant's Motion (#24) for Summary Judgment.”

Motion for sanctions (defendant) Granted

“The Court also GRANTS Defendant's Motion (#54) for Imposition of Sanctions and, accordingly, orders Plaintiff's Counsel, Joshua R. Trigsted, to pay (1) the full amount of the court reporter's charges for the deposition of Ms. Hughes; (2) the attorneys' fees incurred by Defendant in connection with its Motion for Sanctions; and (3) an additional monetary sanction of $500.00.”

Wong v. Colvin
3:13-cv-02209-ST · 2014-11-26
Motion for sanctions (defendant) Denied

“The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#198). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion (#192) for Imposition of Sanctions.”

Miller v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
3:14-cv-00872-PK · 2016-06-22
Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“The Court AFFIRMS Magistrate Judge Papak's Order (#55) denying Plaintiff's Motion (#48) to Amend to Assert Claims for Punitive Damages.”

Liberty v. Sybe Medical Management Corporation
3:18-cv-00542-BR · 2018-05-31
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Based on the record as a whole and in the interest of justice the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion (#10) to Dismiss and DISMISSES Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint without prejudice and GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file a Second Amended Complaint no later than June 20, 2018.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The 2014-2016 case sample predates Brown's senior status and includes post-conviction petitions, prisoner civil-rights matters, medical malpractice, consumer-credit, employment civil-rights, and criminal cases. Several self-represented prisoner filings ended within weeks after judicial screening. Reported durations measure the life of each case, not the time taken to decide a motion.

Draft for Judge Brown with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Brown, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Brown's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace