Ancer L. Haggerty

United States District Court for the District of Oregon district Appointed by Bill Clinton (Democratic) 3 signed orders read

How Judge Haggerty decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

At summary judgment he views the facts and draws inferences most favorably to the non-movant and decides on the actual evidence -- granting for the defense where undisputed facts establish probable cause, denying where the record (e.g. video) shows a genuine dispute.

“On summary judgment, the court must view the facts and draw inferences in the manner most favorable to the non-moving party.”

Cautions

On Oregon intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress claims he enforces the demanding 'socially intolerable conduct' threshold; rude or offensive but isolated remarks are not enough to survive summary judgment.

“one reference to plaintiff being called a "fucking bitch," and one incident of physical intimidation, though rude and unpleasant, fails to amount to socially intolerable behavior sufficient for establishing an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim.”

Motion outcomes

Counted from classified signed orders only. Percentages are shown only where the sample is large enough to be meaningful; smaller samples are reported as raw counts.

Summary judgment
N = 4
Granted: 2Denied: 1Moot / procedural: 1 counts only

A "1 of 1" is one ruling, not a tendency. Treat small samples as illustrative, not predictive.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Lemens v. City of Pendleton
3:04-cv-01702-HA · 2005-05-02
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #11) is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Defendant Bethpage's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #20) is DENIED as moot.”

Martinez v. Mary's Woods at Marylhurst, Inc.
3:05-cv-00437-HA · 2006-05-16
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“For the reasons provided, defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [14] is granted in its entirety.”

Gaines v. Nordstrom, Inc.
3:06-cv-01612-HA · 2007-10-10
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, defendant's motion for summary judgment [12] is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Haggerty's docket caseload under assigned_judge='Ancer Lee Haggerty' (sample of 15, mostly filed 2007-2012 and terminated). Mix spans civil-rights employment, civil-rights other, product liability, insurance/interpleader, contract, patent/trademark, and criminal. Durations below are filing-to-termination case durations, NOT motion-to-ruling latency.