Trish M. Brown

How Judge Brown rules, drawn from 17 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Brown no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2021
Served
1999–2021
Commissioned
1999-12-03
Signed orders read
17

How Judge Brown decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Fraud-based nondischargeability requires proof beyond poor documentation, billing mistakes, or an ordinary commercial dispute.

“Fraud requires that a plaintiff prove more than a simple error”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

State of Oregon v. Hutchins (In re Hutchins)
19-3086-tmb · 2021-03-23
Nondischargeability adversary claim (State of Oregon) Granted

“Based on the evidence received, and under settled principles of law, I must find Ms. Hutchins’s debt to DHS to be nondischargeable under § 523(a)(2)(A).”

Holdner v. Kreitzberg (In re Data Systems, Inc.)
19-3028-tmb · 2020-02-05
Motion to dismiss adversary proceeding (the defendants) Granted in part

“enter a judgment dismissing the first and fourth claims for relief, with prejudice”

Motion for prefiling injunction (Richard and Steven Kreitzberg) Granted

“requiring prefiling approval of any complaint or motion that Holdner seeks to file in this court against the Debtor, the Kreitzberg Defendants, or their affiliates”

Dennis' Seven Dees Landscaping, Inc. v. Pickett (In re Pickett)
19-3004-tmb · 2019-12-11
Complaint to determine dischargeability (Dennis' Seven Dees Landscaping, Inc.) Denied

“DSDL did not carry its burden of proof. I find in favor of Mr. Pickett.”

Pearce v. Woodfield (In re Woodfield)
18-3120-tmb · 2019-05-16
Summary judgment (Parley Pearce) Granted in part

“The court will enter an order granting the motion in part and denying the motion in part, consistent with this opinion.”

Eiler v. Hartner (In re Hartner)
17-3112-tmb · 2018-01-23
Objection to claim (Marcus and Matthew Fullard-Leo) Granted

“Accordingly, the Fullard-Leo’s objection is sustained pursuant to § 502(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.”

In re Mark Clifford Kent and Sharon Janelle Kent
09-35124-tmb13 · 2016-01-22
Motions to dismiss (Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC) Denied

“denying the Motion to Dismiss within seven days.”

In re Marc Gregory Footen and Tina Marie Footen
11-38619-tmb7 · 2012-02-29
Objection to exemption (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“I will, therefore, overrule the Trustee’s objection to the Debtors’ claimed exemptions.”

Eiler v. Nolan (In re John E. Nolan and Ann P. Nolan)
11-3220-tmb · 2011-11-23
Judgment on the pleadings (Kenneth S. Eiler, Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“The Court granted the Trustee’s motion.”

Judgment on the pleadings (John E. Nolan) Denied

“cross-motion denied.”

In re Livia Audrey Glanville; In re Daniel Lloyd Waits and Sarah Jean Waits
11-31815-tmb7; 11-32616-tmb7 · 2011-10-12
Objection to exemption (Michael Batlan, Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“The Trustees’ objections will, therefore, be over-ruled and the Debtors’ exemption claims allowed.”

Objection to exemption (Rodolfo Camacho, Chapter 7 trustee) Denied
Bergemann v. Brion and Higgins (In re Clay Willard Brion III; In re Daniel Richard Higgins)
10-3281-tmb; 10-3282-tmb · 2011-06-22
Summary judgment (Clyde Bergemann, Inc., doing business as Anthony-Ross Company) Granted

“Because Plaintiff’s motion was granted under § 523(a)(6), the Court did not take up the § 523(a)(4) claim.”

Summary judgment (Clay Brion III and Daniel Higgins) Denied

“Defendants’ cross motions will be denied.”

In re Robert Joseph Collins
10-32098-tmb13 · 2010-12-15
Plan confirmation (Robert Joseph Collins) Denied

“Accordingly, the court denied confirmation of the plan.”

In re Paul Grignon and Barbara Grace Hendrix
10-34196-tmb13 · 2010-12-07
Objection to plan confirmation (Wayne Godare, Chapter 13 trustee) Denied

“Accordingly, the court found that the plan was not filed solely to avoid the wholly unsecured lien on the debtors’ residence and overruled the trustee’s objection.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

All ten sampled adversary proceedings were terminated. Four express outcomes were available; other streams were empty, label-only, or did not state who prevailed.

A historical record

Judge Brown no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.