Teresa H. Pearson

How Judge Pearson rules, drawn from 10 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Commissioned
October 4, 2021
Signed orders read
10

About Judge Pearson

Teresa H. Pearson has served as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Oregon since October 2021. Her court handles bankruptcy cases and related adversary proceedings in Oregon.

Judge Pearson's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Pearson's own (checked October 10, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Pearson decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Cotton, Pearson sustained the trustee’s exemption objection after finding that the cited crime-victim reparation exemption covered economic damages, while the debtor’s settlement expressly awarded noneconomic damages.

“for an award under a crime victim reparation act is limited to awards of economic damages.”

Procedural preferences

Authorities produced with artificial-intelligence assistance must be personally reviewed and independently verified before citation.

“If an attorney or party wants to cite authority provided by artificial intelligence, the court expects that the attorney or party will review that authority personally and independently verify information stated about that authority is correct before submitting a document citing that authority to the court.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Eiler v. Farrington (In re Farrington)
25-3076-thp · 2026-04-06
Default judgment (Kenneth S. Eiler) Granted

“The Court Will Enter a Default Judgment for a Mandatory Injunction and Specific Performance.”

Request to appoint receiver (Kenneth S. Eiler) Denied

“Because this court does not have authority to appoint a receiver in this adversary proceeding, the court will not sign the proposed form of judgment submitted by the plaintiff trustee.”

In re Perkins
24-32731-thp13 · 2025-07-28
Motion to alter or amend (Eugene Ezra Perkins) Denied

“ORDERED that the Motion to Alter or Amend is denied.”

In re Leavell
25-60160-thp7 · 2025-04-25
Objection to exemption (the Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“For the reasons set forth above, the court will sustain the trustee’s objection to Mr. Leavell’s claims of exemption”

Marasciullo v. Boyd (In re Boyd)
24-6054-thp · 2025-02-11
Summary judgment (Steve and Stephanie Marasciullo) Denied

“this court will deny plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and grant defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment.”

Summary judgment (Candace Amborn) Granted
Summary judgment (Donald E. Grove) Granted
Summary judgment (Keith Y. Boyd) Granted
In re Roy MacMillan
23-30159-thp11 · 2023-06-29
Critical vendor motion (Roy MacMillan) Denied

“For the reasons set forth above, the court cannot authorize debtor’s payment of Keicher as a critical vendor.”

In re Frysinger
22-31202-thp13 · 2022-12-21

The court held that voluntary retirement-account withdrawals could constitute sufficiently regular income for Chapter 13 eligibility on the stated facts.

Supplee v. Sheehy (In re Sheehy)
26-03007-thp · 2026-06-03
Summary judgment (Kevin Marcel Sheehy) Granted in part

“the court grants and denies each of the motions in part.”

Summary judgment (Kerry and Anna Supplee) Granted in part
In re Reinard Adolph Pollmann
25-60008-thp7 · 2026-07-01
Request for broker compensation (the Chapter 7 trustee) Granted in part

“the court will allow some, but not all, of the requested compensation to Pacific Coast.”

In re Marvissa Etasha Cotton
3:26-bk-30793 · 2026-10-01
Objection to exemption (trustee) Granted

“For the reasons set forth above, the court concludes that the debtor cannot claim an exemption for the proceeds of the settlement under ORS 18.345(1)(j). The court will enter an order sustaining the trustee’s objection. The order will be without prejudice to the debtor amending her exemptions to claim any other appropriate exemption in the settlement proceeds.”

Hefflinger v. Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services
3:25-ap-03095 · 2026-09-25

After trial, Pearson concluded that the agency’s civil penalties were excepted from discharge and its regulatory licensing actions did not violate the discharge injunction. The decision directed judgment for the agency but did not resolve a party motion.

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

One sampled adversary proceeding was terminated; the four individual cases and the RODA Chapter 11 case remained pending in the index.

Draft for Judge Pearson with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Pearson, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Pearson's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace