Timothy D. DeGiusti

United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma district Appointed by George W. Bush (Republican) 16 signed orders read

How Judge DeGiusti decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Adopts thorough magistrate R&Rs in full where objections are non-specific or untimely; a blanket objection that fails to cite the specific information allegedly ignored does not preserve the issue for de novo (or appellate) review.

“this type of blanket objection without argument or authorities, is not sufficient to preserve an issue for further review.”

Procedural preferences

Strict on the LCvR37.1 meet-and-confer requirement; denies discovery motions that skip it and prefers an in-chambers face-to-face conference between lead counsel before any discovery hearing.

“it is this Court's customary practice to require a face-to-face meeting between lead counsel for the parties in chambers before conducting a hearing on a discovery motion.”

Cautions

Reconsideration / Rule 59(e) motions are disfavored 'extreme remedies'; will not entertain expanded arguments, points raised for the first time in reply (deemed waived), or rehashing of decided issues.

“A motion to reconsider is not a second opportunity for the losing party to make its strongest case, to rehash arguments, or to dress up arguments that previously failed.”

Pro se litigants get liberal construction but no advocacy: the court will not create arguments for them or excuse non-compliance with the federal rules.

“courts are not to serve as a pro se plaintiff's advocate and are not bound to create arguments for a plaintiff merely because he is pro se.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Maldonado Castillo v. Prater
5:23-cv-00675-D · 2024-01-02
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Stewart's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 6] is GRANTED; ... Defendant OCCJA's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 39] is GRANTED; Defendant Turn Key's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 41] is GRANTED ... Based on these rulings, Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. No. 1] is DISMISSED without prejudice.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant CJ's Bail Bonds' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 16] is GRANTED;”

Motion for sanctions (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Stewart's Motion for Sanctions [Doc. No. 32] is DENIED;”

Christensen v. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
5:23-cv-00097-D · 2024-03-22
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 18] is GRANTED. All Plaintiff's motions are moot and, therefore, DENIED.”

Anaya-Smith v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company
5:20-cv-00565-D · 2025-07-03
Motion to alter amend judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for New Trial and Brief in Support [Doc. No. 62] is DENIED.”

Aceco Valves, LLC v. Neal
5:21-cv-00368-D · 2022-10-14
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider [Doc. No. 92] is DENIED.”

Watkins v. Property Management Services, Incorporated
5:22-cv-00718-D · 2023-05-16
Motions to compel (defendant) Moot / procedural

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Compel [Doc. No. 30] is DENIED without prejudice to a future submission upon compliance with LCvR37.1.”

Schriner v. Gerard
5:23-cv-00206-D
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Century Trucking, Inc.'s motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 6] is GRANTED.”

Simpson v. Quick
5:25-cv-01221-D
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“the Court finds that it does not have jurisdiction to enjoin the Defendants as requested and, alternatively, Plaintiff has failed to establish the necessary factors supporting an injunction, and therefore DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction [Doc. No. 26].”

Gravlee v. State of Oklahoma
5:24-cv-00221-D
Motion for voluntary dismissal (plaintiff) Granted

“the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 23] in its entirety and GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion [Doc. No. 20].”

Hawkins v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
5:25-cv-00849-D
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand to State Court [Doc. No. 16] is GRANTED, and the case is REMANDED to the District Court of Cleveland County, Oklahoma.”

The Bass Tank, LLC v. MET Inc.
5:22-cv-01086-D
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant's Replacement Motion for Partial Summary Judgment & Memorandum in Support of Its Motion [Doc. No. 32] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as fully set forth herein.”

Altstatt v. Board of County Commissioners for Oklahoma County
5:22-cv-00811-D
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Greg Williams and Kevin Wagner [Doc. No. 60] is GRANTED. Plaintiff's action against these defendants is DISMISSED without prejudice.”

Altstatt v. Board of County Commissioners for Oklahoma County
5:22-cv-00811-D
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Sue Ann Arnall, Joe Allbaugh, Francie Ekwerekwu, Todd Lamb, Jim Couch, Ben Brown, and M.T. Berry [Doc. No. 59] is GRANTED. Plaintiff's action against these defendants is DISMISSED without prejudice.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 94 days (N = 17).

The sample mixes civil and criminal matters, with a substantial pro se prisoner and habeas component frequently referred to magistrate judges, alongside counseled commercial, insurance, and contract litigation.

Put Judge DeGiusti's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge DeGiusti actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge DeGiusti's own signed orders and cites them.