Shon T. Erwin

“the claims asserted against GEO Group are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim, (2) the claim against Defendant Topping is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim”

“(3) summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendant Garrett, and (4) dismissal and summary judgment are denied with respect to the claim asserted against Defendant Rowley in her individual capacity.”

“Defendant Braggs' Motion (Doc. No. 61), considered as a Motion for Summary Judgment, is GRANTED in its entirety.”

“the Report [Doc. #37] is ADOPTED as to plaintiff's claims against defendants Gray and Fowler, and defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. 25] is DENIED as to them. ... the recommendation of the Report is ADOPTED as to plaintiff's claims against defendants Lindsey and Allbaugh and defendants' motion is GRANTED as to those defendants.”

“The Court should grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment regarding non-exhaustion of administrative remedies, but only as to Plaintiff Johnson. As to the remaining Plaintiffs, the Court should deny summary judgment and conclude that administrative remedies were effectively unavailable to them.”

“it is recommended that Petitioner’s Motion, (ECF No. 7) be DENIED and that he be ordered to prepay the full $5.00 filing fee for this action to proceed.”

“the undersigned magistrate judge recommends that the decision of the Commissioner be REVERSED AND REMANDED.”

“the undersigned recommends the Court GRANT Petitioner’s habeas petition, in part, and order Respondents to bring Petitioner before an immigration judge (IJ) for a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within seven business days or otherwise release Petitioner if he has not received a lawful bond hearing within that period.”

Section 1915A screening R&R recommending dismissal of a pro se Section 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim because it did not make clear which defendant did what. Zero-motion screening disposition; quote: “The Court should DISMISS Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” District-judge order confirms Erwin as author.

Section 1915A / 1915(e)(2)(B) screening R&R on a pro se Section 1983 prisoner complaint recommending dismissal of all individual-capacity claims and the official-capacity injunctive claims (some with, some without prejudice). Zero-motion screening disposition; quote: “Based on that review, it is recommended that the Court: (1) dismiss the individual capacity claims for injunctive relief, against all Defendants, with prejudice”. District-judge referral confirms Erwin as author.

Sua sponte R&R recommending dismissal without prejudice of a pro se Section 1983 action for failure to cure filing deficiencies and comply with the court's order. Zero-motion case-management disposition; quote: “it is recommended that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this Court’s orders.” Companion district-judge order confirms the R&R was issued by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on June 20, 2025.

“Based on the foregoing, the Court should: (1) deny the Motions to Dismiss to the extent they seek dismissal of the action due to untimely and improper service; (2) quash the original service attempt on Defendants Gabriel, Hamilton, Hagen, Peek, and Amason in their individual capacities; and (3) allow Mr. Arnett 30 days to effectuate proper service on these Defendants in their individual capacities or risk dismissal of the claims against them.”

“Based upon the foregoing analysis, it is recommended that the Amended Petition (ECF No. 7) be DISMISSED.”