Thomas Rutherford Brett

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma district Retired 2003 · served 1979–2003 Appointed by Jimmy Carter (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Judge Brett no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Brett decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He required more than speculation to create a trial-worthy factual dispute at summary judgment.

“The Tenth Circuit requires ‘more than pure speculation to defeat a motion for summary judgment’”

Cautions

When reviewing an arbitration dismissal, he focused on whether the claimant received a fundamentally fair opportunity to present evidence.

“The issue is whether or not claimant Dalton was granted a fair hearing under the Arbitration Code to offer evidence in support of his factual claims.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Mendez-Lopez
· 1981-12-22
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“defendant’s Motion to Dismiss on the ground of a defective information is hereby sustained and the cause dismissed.”

Catron v. United States
· 1983-08-29
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is overruled.”

Bigheart Pipeline Corp. v. United States
· 1984-10-18
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the motion for summary judgment of the United States is sustained”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“the motion for summary judgment of Core Energy is overruled.”

Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance
· 1986-01-10
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“the plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is denied.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is also denied.”

Powell v. Department of Corrections, State of Oklahoma
· 1986-02-20
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s *972 civil rights complaint and petition for Writ of Mandamus be and is hereby granted.”

In re Heston Oil Co.
· 1986-10-09
Bankruptcy appeal (appellant) Denied

“the decision of the Bankruptcy Court be and is hereby affirmed.”

McKinney v. Jones
· 1987-03-19
Bankruptcy appeal (appellant) Denied

“Wesley R. McKinney’s consolidated appeals in this matter be denied.”

Oklahoma Wildlife Federation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
· 1988-01-05
Injunction claim (plaintiff) Denied

“the injunction prayed for herein by Plaintiffs and Inter-venors directing the United States Army Corps of Engineers to revoke or suspend issuance of said permit until and unless an Environmental Impact Statement on the project is completed is denied.”

Barringer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
· 1988-11-22
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment be sustained and the case dismissed.”

Pearson v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works
· 1988-12-19
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss is overruled”

Kennedy v. Freeman
· 1989-04-20
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is hereby SUSTAINED”

Howell ex rel. Patterson v. City of Catoosa
· 1990-01-03
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants, City of Catoosa, James Enos Combs and Joe Garber, and against Plaintiffs”

A historical record

Judge Brett no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.