Terrence L. Michael

How Judge Michael rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Michael no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Position
bankruptcy
Status
No longer serving
Signed orders read
25

How Judge Michael decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Post-filing services that were both supplied to and beneficial to the debtor supported administrative-priority treatment.

“Here, the services of Regional were both supplied to and beneficial to the post-bankruptcy Hospital Trust.”

Procedural preferences

The court expects briefs to connect cited decisions to the facts and to distinguish holdings from dicta.

“Be wary of the case which is factually dissimilar to yours, but has a great sound bite. Be sure (either in your brief or at oral argument) to explain why the factually dissimilar case is applicable to your situation. Also, be cognizant of the difference between the holding of a case and the dicta contained therein.”

Cautions

Personal attacks and unsupported accusations of unethical conduct detract from the merits of a filing.

“Of all the personal attacks that can be placed in a brief, the least persuasive (at least to this judge) is the allegation that opposing counsel has engaged in unethical conduct. Such allegations have absolutely no place in a pleading filed in this Court.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Henry
· 2015-07-01
Debtors objection to amended proof of claim (Debtors) Granted

“The Objection is sustained. The Chase Amended Claim is disallowed.”

Creditor request for leave to amend proof of claim (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.) Denied

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. be, and the same hereby is, denied leave to file an amended proof of claim in this case.”

In re Clark
· 2016-06-21
Chapter 13 trustee objection to unsecured claim (Chapter 13 Trustee) Granted

“The Claim Objection is sustained. The LVNV Claim is disallowed in its entirety.”

In re Craig County Hospital Authority
· 2017-06-08
Neo orthopedics motion for allowance of administrative claim (NEO Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Inc.) Granted

“at Docket No. 30k, Regional Medical Laboratory, Inc., at Docket No. 305, Lakeland Financial Services, LLO, at Docket No. 306, and Lakeland Office Systems, Inc., at Docket No. 307, are granted.”

Regional medical laboratory motion for allowance of administrative claim (Regional Medical Laboratory, Inc.) Granted
Lakeland financial services motion for allowance of administrative claim (Lakeland Financial Services, LLO) Granted
Lakeland office systems motion for allowance of administrative claim (Lakeland Office Systems, Inc.) Granted
Ivey Brookside, LLC v. White (In re White)
· 2016-08-25
Defendant motion for summary judgment (Defendant) Granted

“Therefore summary judgement in favor of Defendant is appropriate, and this action must be dismissed.”

In re Gordon
· 2013-01-04
Trustee motion for sanctions and costs (Chapter 7 Trustee) Denied

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Trustee’s Motion for Sanctions and Costs Against Commerce Bank and Its Counsel, filed by Patrick J. Malloy III, Trustee, at Docket No. 290, be, and the same hereby is, denied without prejudice.”

Saffa v. Wallace (In re Wallace)
· 2004-06-23
Plaintiff motion for citation of criminal contempt (Ronald J. Saffa) Denied

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Citation of Criminal Contempt filed June 9, 2004, by Ronald J. Saffa, plaintiff herein be, and the same hereby is, denied without prejudice.”

Malloy v. Zeeco, Inc. (In re Applied Thermal Systems, Inc.)
· 2003-06-30
Defendant motion to withdraw reference (Zeeco, Inc.) Denied

“The Court concludes that the Complaint is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C.A. § 157(b)(2)(C) (West 2003), and recommends that the Motion to Withdraw Reference filed by Zeeco, Inc., Defendant herein, be denied.”

In re Beautyco, Inc.
· 2004-03-30
Debtor application to extend time to assume or reject leases (Beautyco, Inc.) Granted in part

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application for Order Extending the Time within which Debtor may Assume or Reject Unexpired Leases of Nonresidential Real Property and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing filed February 17, 2004, by Beautyco, Inc., debtor herein, be, and the same hereby is, granted in part.”

In re Brown
· 2007-07-19
Counsel motion to alter or amend judgment (James S. Matthews, Jr.) Granted in part

“The Motion is granted in part. Matthews is granted an additional 25 days to perform the tasks required of him under the Judgment. All other requests for relief are denied.”

In re the Music Store, Inc.
· 1999-11-13
Accountant application for interim fees and expenses (Jim D. Manley, CPA, Inc.) Granted in part

“Of the fees sought, $1,336.75 relate to services performed by Manley prior to the filing of the application to approve its employment. Those fees will be disallowed. The balance of the fees sought, in the sum of $18,633.25, is approved.”

In re Oklahoma Trash Control, Inc.
· 2001-02-01
Debtor motion for authority to assume executory contract (Oklahoma Trash Control, Inc.) Denied

“The Motion for Authority to Assume Executory Contract filed by Oklahoma Trash Control, Inc., Debtor herein, is denied.”

In re Hoover
· 2000-10-23
Secured creditor objection to chapter 13 plan (Conseco Finance Servicing Corporation) Granted

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Amended Chapter 13 Plan filed on June 9, 2000, at Docket No. 19, by Shelly R. Hoover and Tracy E. Hoover, Debtors herein, be, and the same hereby is, not confirmed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The median reflects case-level filing and termination dates only; the sampled matters contained no archived motion entries.

A historical record

Judge Michael no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.