John F. Heil, III

How Judge Heil rules, drawn from 33 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Position
district
Appointed by
Donald Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
2020-05-27
Education
Oklahoma State University (B.S., 1990); University of Tulsa College of Law (J.D., with honors, 1994)
Signed orders read
33

How Judge Heil decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On a recurring Major Crimes Act assimilation argument, the judge looked to how other judges in the same district had already resolved the identical question and adopted their reasoning rather than treating the issue as open.

“Although these decisions are not binding on this Court, they are persuasive, and the Court today rules in harmony with them.”

Procedural preferences

When neither side objects to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation within the fourteen-day window, the judge adopts it without independent re-analysis, rather than writing a fresh opinion.

“Neither party objected to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation within the fourteen-day period prescribed by 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and accepts and adopts it as the order of this Court.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Moore v. Harpe
23-CV-048-JFH-GLJ · 2024-04-30
Motions to dismiss (respondent) Granted

“the Court grants Harpe's motion to dismiss the petition [Dkt. No. 9]... the petition for writ of habeas corpus [Dkt. No. 1] is DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(d)(1)'s one-year statute of limitations”

Scarbrough v. Dowling
21-CV-277-JFH-KEW · 2022-09-09
Motions to dismiss (respondent) Granted

“Respondent's motion to dismiss Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus as second or successive [Dkt. No. 11] should be GRANTED.”

United States v. Wilson
22-CR-092-JFH · 2023-04-14
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to dismiss [Dkt. No. 82] filed by Defendant Kaira Leigh Wilson is DENIED.”

Spears v. Okmulgee County Criminal Justice Trust Authority
23-CV-65-JFH-GLJ · 2023-06-22
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Okmulgee County Criminal Justice Trust Authority's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [Dkt. No. 13] is DENIED”

King v. Okmulgee County Jail Trust Authority
21-CV-367-JFH-GJL · 2023-04-17
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 21] is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Okmulgee County Board of County Commissioners and Okmulgee County Criminal Justice Authority are dismissed with prejudice”

United States v. Weaver
23-CV-422-JFH · 2024-04-15
Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Granted

“the United States' Motion [Dkt. No. 37] is GRANTED and the Supplemental Complaint [Dkt. No. 27] is dismissed with prejudice.”

United States v. John Matthew James
6:22-cr-00064 · 2023-06-30
Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Granted

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Government's motion to dismiss [Dkt. No. 84] is GRANTED and the Indictment [Dkt. No. 22] is dismissed without prejudice.”

United States v. Shawn Claude Rose
6:21-cr-00257 · 2022-03-29
Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Granted

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Government's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 39] is GRANTED and the Indictment [Dkt. No. 2] is dismissed without prejudice as to Defendant Shawn Claude Rose.”

Donald Ray Logsdon v. Doris Crawford
6:21-cv-00252 · 2024-04-29
Motion for sanctions (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Comply with the Court's Order on Defendant's Motion to Compel [Dkt. No. 119] is granted. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice.”

Autumn Blanton v. Martin Wilson et al.
6:23-cv-00401 · 2023-03-04
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“On that basis, Defendant WW Tank & Vessel, Inc.'s motion to dismiss [Dkt. No. 12] is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant WW Tank & Vessel, Inc. are DISMISSED without prejudice.”

Natosha Lyons v. City of Ada et al.
6:21-cv-00297 · 2023-12-20
Summary judgment (defendant) Moot / procedural

“On that basis, the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Brian Ridgeway, Colton Stonecipher, and Max Crook [Dkt. No. 77] is MOOT.”

Darvin W. Gray v. Carrie Bridges
6:23-cv-00045 · 2024-01-26
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Gray's ‘Motion For: Objection to Court Ruling’ [Dkt. No. 11] is denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The caseload sample spans Social Security disability appeals, state-prisoner habeas petitions, Section 1983 civil-rights suits, and an ERISA interpleader action over a life-insurance death benefit. Several dispositions arose from judicial screening rather than party motions; two sampled cases produced separately classified motion outcomes.

Draft for Judge Heil with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Heil, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Heil's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace