Tom R. Cornish

How Judge Cornish rules, drawn from 26 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Cornish no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2021
Served
1994–2021
Commissioned
1994-02-07
Education
Oklahoma State University, B.S. in Business, 1966; University of Oklahoma, J.D., 1968; University of Virginia, LL.M., 1982
Signed orders read
26

How Judge Cornish decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Judicial and statutory liens were treated as mutually exclusive categories when applying lien-avoidance rules.

“The definitions of ‘judicial lien’ and ‘statutory lien’ are mutually exclusive.”

Procedural preferences

Fee requests above routine amounts required specific, contemporaneous supporting records.

“This Court expects specific and detailed time records. This Court also admonishes counsel to make contemporaneous time entries.”

Cautions

A late proof of claim had to be disallowed once a proper objection was raised.

“The Court has no discretion here but to disallow a late-filed claim once an objection is raised”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Ridley v. M & T Bank (In re Ridley)
· 2017-05-31
Defendant posttrial motion to strike (M & T Bank) Granted in part

“The Court agrees and therefore grants the Motion to Strike Exhibit A. As for the specific paragraphs M & T Bank seeks to strike on the grounds that they are misleading, inflammatory and hearsay, the Court declines to grant that relief.”

In re Thompson
· 2017-03-31
Debtor objection to late filed mortgage claim (Debtor) Granted

“The Court sustains Debtor’s objection only on the ground that Chase’s proof of claim was filed after the bar date.”

Mortgage creditor objection to plan confirmation (JPMorgan Chase Bank) Granted

“The Court declines to confirm Debtor’s Amended Plan as proposed.”

In re Colley
· 2017-03-31
Debtor objection to late filed mortgage claim (Debtor) Granted

“Chase’s proof of claim will be disallowed on the grounds that it was filed after the bar date.”

Garland v. United States (In Re Garland)
· 2008-03-31

Contextual exclusion: the consolidated denial-of-discharge and tax proceedings were decided after trial rather than on a classified motion or objection.

Miller Ex Rel. Estate of Goss v. Martin (In Re Goss)
· 2007-09-25

Contextual exclusion: the preference claims were decided after trial rather than on a classified motion or objection.

Arvest Bank v. Green (In Re Green)
· 2006-10-19

Contextual exclusion: the dischargeability and denial-of-discharge claims were decided after trial rather than on a classified motion or objection.

In Re Harris
· 2006-10-13

Contextual exclusion: the order established a presumption of abuse and set a deadline to convert or show special circumstances, but did not finally resolve the dismissal motion.

In Re Goss
· 2006-09-18
Creditors objections to claimed exemptions (Todd and Misty Bowles) Granted

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Creditors’ objections to Debtor’s claim of exemptions are granted.”

Tulsa Spine Hospital, LLC v. Tucker (In Re Tucker)
· 2006-07-25

Contextual exclusion: the dischargeability claim was decided after trial rather than on a classified motion or objection.

In Re Johns
· 2006-05-26
United states trustee motion to dismiss for presumed abuse (United States Trustee) Granted

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the United States Trustee’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 707(b)(1) Based on Presumption of Abuse Arising Under 11 U.S.C. 707(b)(2) with Authority in Support and with Notice and Opportunity for Hearing, is granted.”

United states trustee alternative motion to dismiss (United States Trustee) Moot / procedural

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the withdrawal of the United States Trustee’s .Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 707(b)(3) with Authority in Support and with Notice and Opportunity for Hearing, is approved.”

In Re Beaumont
· 2006-02-28
Debtor motion to avoid judicial lien (Debtor) Granted

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion to Avoid Lien of the Estate of Earl Wayne Meadows, filed by the Debtor, is granted.”

In Re Phillips
· 2006-01-06
Debtor motion to extend automatic stay (Debtor) Granted

“THEREFORE, the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence, that the automatic stay should be continued in this case until further Order of the Court.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The median reflects case-level filing and termination dates only; the sampled matters contained no archived motion entries.

A historical record

Judge Cornish no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.