Jack Sherman Jr.
Judge Sherman no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“On April 26, 1999, Magistrate Judge Sherman issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending defendants’ motion to dismiss or motion for summary judgment be granted.”
“Defendants’ objections to the Magistrate Judge’s June 1, 1999 Report and Recommendation are SUSTAINED. Defendants’ April 26, 1999 motion to dismiss this action for failure to effect timely service (Doc. 7) is GRANTED.”
“REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GRANTING MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE”
“Magistrate-Judge Jack Sherman, Jr. ordered Burns & McDonnell to turn over any relevant documents in its possession. Magistrate-Judge Sherman further determined that Armco would have to go to court in the Western District of Missouri to obtain any documents in Arthur Anderson’s possession.”
“Magistrate Judge Sherman further recommended that the motion for injunctive relief be granted as to the requests for governmental filings and copies to Plaintiffs of the 1990-93 annual reports, and that Defendants be directed to comply therewith by August 2, 1994.”
“this Court hereby imposes a protective order requiring the plaintiff to maintain the confidentiality of the information produced except as needed for purposes of this litigation.”
“In a September 11, 1992 Order, Magistrate Judge Jack Sherman, Jr. granted Northrop’s Motion to Compel Relator Grand to produce his ‘written disclosure of substantially all material evidence and information’ provided to the Government.”
“Plaintiff is entitled to judgment in her favor and an award of costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees.”
“THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (96-1144, DOC. 19) BE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART;”
“THE KINGMANS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (96-1183, DOC. 10) BE DENIED;”
“Defendants’ counterclaim against CTC is dismissed.”
“It is therefore ORDERED that judgment be entered for defendants.”
“The Court previously recommended that plaintiff Volvo GM Heavy Truck Corporation’s (Volvo GM’s) motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part,”
“the Court RECOMMENDS defendant/third-party plaintiff Key’s motion for summary judgment (doc. 29) be DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY.”
“the Court RECOMMENDS General Motors’s motion for summary judgment (doc. 30) be GRANTED against Key’s claims for breach of contract, violation of O.R.C. § 1331.01, and fraud regarding the parties’ PSA; but be DENIED against Key’s causes of action under O.R.C. § 4517.01 and 15 U.S.C. § 1221, and for fraud regarding the promoting and selling of GM’s heavy-duty trucks.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 269.5 days (N = 6).
The randomized late-service sample includes employment, contract, motor-vehicle, federal-employer-liability, and insurance matters. All six sampled cases were terminated.
A historical record
Judge Sherman no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.