Gregory Lynn Frost
Judge Frost no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“For the reasons set forth above, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22) and DENIES as MOOT Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Class Certification and Court Authorized Notice (ECF. No. 19).”
“The Court DENIES Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. # 44) and GRANTS Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in regard to Claims One and Two (Doc. # 48).”
“The Court also DENIES AS MOOT the motions to strike. (Docs. # 59, 60.)”
“Because Plaintiff has demonstrated a substantial likelihood of succeeding on his Equal Protection claim, this Court finds the motion for injunctive relief well taken.”
“Based on the foregoing, the Court GRANTS the Honda Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #60), DENIES AS MOOT the Honda Defendants’ Motion to Strike (Doc. # 60), and DENIES the parties’ request for oral argument.”
“In light of the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. # 6). The Court GRANTS dismissal as to Defendant Franklin County Board of Commissioners and DENIES dismissal as to Defendant Franklin County.”
“Based on the foregoing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary Injunction. (Doc. # 4.)”
“GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply Instanter (Doc. # 54)”
“GRANTS the Health Plan Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. # 39)”
“DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record Based as it relates to Plaintiffs entitlement to benefits claim and DENIES without prejudice to refiling the portion of Plaintiffs Motion related to her request for attorneys’ fees (Doc. # 73)”
“According to the above analysis, the Court GRANTS the Health Plan Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Promissory Estoppel Claim.”
“GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment on her Non-Disclosure Claim.”
“For the reasons set forth above, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. # 39)”
“GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs breach of contract claim and DENIES it as to Plaintiffs fraud claim (Doc. # 41)”
“DENIES as MOOT Defendant’s motion to strike the affidavit of Brad Peterson (Doc. #45)”
“For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the joint combined motions to dismiss. (Doc. # 10 in 2:09-cv-430; Doc. # 12 in 2:09-cv-440; Doc. # 9 in 2:09-cv-512; Doc. # 11 in 2:09-cv-513; Doc. # 16 in 2:09-cv-520.).”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
The fixed ten-case sample is a small early-tenure slice containing insurance, patent, prisoner-rights, employment, labor, contract, occupational-safety, disability-benefits, and other statutory matters. It is descriptive rather than a career caseload estimate.
A historical record
Judge Frost no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.