Albert Clifton Thompson

How Judge Thompson rules, drawn from 18 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Thompson no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1898–1910
Appointed by
William McKinley (Republican)
Commissioned
1898-09-23
Education
Read law, 1864
Signed orders read
18

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Louisville & C. Packet Co.
· 1899-05-22
Motion to confirm master report (intervener) Denied

“The motion therefore will Ik1 overruled.”

Motion to dissolve restraining order (intervener) Denied
Hicks v. Knost
· 1899-06-01
Motion for injunction (bankruptcy trustee) Denied

“The motion for the injunction will be overruled”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the bill will be dismissed, at complainant’s costs.”

Hoyt v. Computing Scale Co.
· 1899-07-22
Motion for more definite statement (defendant) Granted

“The motion, therefore, will he sustained.”

In re Welch
· 1899-09-19
Bankruptcy discharge (bankrupt) Denied

“the bankrupt’s petition, therefore, will be dismissed, at his costs.”

In re Gerdes
· 1900-01-13
Motion for injunction (bankruptcy trustee) Denied

“it is hereby dismissed”

Stearns v. Flick
· 1900-09-24
Motion to compel turnover (bankruptcy trustee) Denied

“no order will be made requiring Mm to pay these moneys to the trustee.”

Assignee claims (state assignee) Denied

“The claims, therefore, of the assignee, will be disallowed”

Motion to compel turnover (bankruptcy trustee) Granted

“he will be ordered to pay over to the trustee the $1,472.21- now on deposit”

In re Troth
· 1900-09-24
Expense reimbursement (bankruptcy referee) Granted

“The $4 item is for printing notices, traveling expenses, and telephone messages, and will he allowed”

Request for extra compensation (bankruptcy referee) Denied

“The additional compensation asked for, therefore, must be. refused”

Falter v. Reinhard
· 1900-09-28
Petition to review referee decision (challenging creditor and receiver) Denied

“the rulings and orders of the réferee complained of will he approved and confirmed.”

In re Flick
· 1900-11-05
Petition to review referee decision (claimants) Denied

“his order disallowing the claims above mentioned is affirmed.”

In re Press-Post Printing Co.
· 1901-01-11
Petition to review referee decision (conditional sellers) Denied

“The findings and order of the referee will be approved and confirmed.”

United States v. Horman
· 1901-04-06
Motion to quash indictment (defendants) Denied

“the motions to quash and the demurrers to these indictments should be overruled”

Demurrer to indictment (defendants) Denied
In re John Morrow & Co.
· 1901-10-31
Petition to review referee decision (creditor) Granted

“The order of the referee, therefore, will be reversed”

Creditor claim (creditor) Granted

“the claim of the creditor should be allowed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No assigned historical case set was enumerable, so no case-mix or duration claim is made.

A historical record

Judge Thompson no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.