Burton Perlman

How Judge Perlman rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Perlman no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 1993
Served
1976–1993
Commissioned
1976-01-01
Signed orders read
25

How Judge Perlman decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A confirmed plan was interpreted as a contract according to its unambiguous text.

“It is fundamental in bankruptcy law that a confirmed Chapter 11 plan is to be regarded as a contract.”

Procedural preferences

A request for a separate statutory injunction had to be brought through an adversary proceeding.

“the court would not consider the merits of the motion for a § 105 injunction on the present motion, because F.R.B.P. 7016, upon which the UCC expressly relies in its motion, itself requires that such relief be sought through an adversary proceeding.”

Cautions

Broad examination demands required a concrete showing of good cause.

“the one seeking to conduct a 2004 examination has the burden of showing good cause for the examination which it seeks.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Caradon Doors & Windows, Inc. (In Re Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.)
· 2002-05-09
Reorganized debtor motion to enforce plan and confirmation order (Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.) Granted

“After remand, this court concludes that Eagle-Picher’s Motion for Order Enforcing the Plan and the Confirmation Order to Stay Actions of Caradon Doors and Windows, Inc. should be granted.”

Sigman v. Aetna Life Insurance (In Re Sigman)
· 2001-12-07
Debtors motion for contempt sanctions and expenses (Debtors) Denied

“Accordingly, debtor’s Motions for Contempt, Sanctions, and for Expenses are denied in their entirety.”

Debtor objection to late filed policy copy (Debtor) Denied

“Because such filing is not prejudicial, the objection is overruled.”

Ohio Medical Instrument Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. (In Re Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.)
· 2001-10-25
Motion for declaration regarding scope of confirmed plan (Ohio Medical Instrument Company) Granted

“It is Ordered and Adjudged that the Product Liability Contribution Claim of Ohio Medical Instrument Company is not barred or discharged by the Confirmed Plan”

Swallen's, Inc. v. Corken Steel Products Co. (In Re Swallen's, Inc.)
· 2000-12-19
Defendant motion for summary judgment (Corken Steel Products Company) Granted in part

“Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied in its entirety, EXCEPT that defendant may, on the basis of § 547(c)(4), set off against ‘current payments’”

Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Plaintiffs) Granted in part

“Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety EXCEPT that it is denied to the extent that defendant is entitled to a credit for new value”

In Re Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.
· 2000-05-24
Personal injury trust motion to enforce express trust (Personal Injury Trust) Denied

“The motion of the PI Trust will be denied.”

In Re Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.
· 1997-12-24
Reorganized debtor motion to enforce plan and confirmation order (Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.) Granted

“We hold that EPI is protected by the confirmation injunction from pursuit by Therma-Tru of any pre-petition or pre-confirmation claims in the Michigan suit.”

First Centennial Title Co. v. Bailey (In Re Bailey)
· 1997-12-29

Contextual exclusion: dischargeability judgment followed a merits determination rather than a classified motion or objection.

In Re Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.
· 1997-12-24
Reorganized debtor motion to enforce plan and confirmation order (Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.) Granted

“we hold that the motion of Eagle-Pieher Industries, Inc. is well taken.”

Lester v. Meadows (In Re Meadows)
· 1997-08-21
Plaintiff motion for summary judgment (Plaintiff) Granted

“Accordingly, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted”

Defendant motion for summary judgment (Defendant) Denied

“and that of defendant denied.”

In Re Cincinnati Microwave, Inc.
· 1997-06-25
Debtor motion to approve settlement (Debtor) Denied

“debtor’s Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement is denied.”

In Re Swallen's, Inc.
· 1997-06-10
Unsecured creditors committee motion to approve settlement (Unsecured Creditors Committee) Denied

“The Motion to Approve Swallen Family Settlement filed by the UCC is denied.”

In Re Swallen's, Inc.
· 1997-05-22
Bank request for administrative expense treatment of prepetition chargebacks (Fifth Third Bank) Denied

“Accordingly, the request by the Bank for administrative expense treatment for charge-backs based upon pre-petition transactions is denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The median reflects case-level filing and termination dates only; the sampled matters contained no archived motion entries.

A historical record

Judge Perlman no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.