Samuel H. Bell

United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio district Deceased · served 1982–2010 Appointed by Ronald Reagan (Republican) 23 signed orders read

Judge Bell no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. v. Hoover Co.
· 1994-02-25
Evidentiary objection (plaintiff Royal Appliance Manufacturing Company) Granted

“The Court agrees that this study should be excluded from evidence in light of Hoover’s prior motion in limine to exclude it and Royal’s voluntary compliance with and reliance on that motion.”

United States v. Fairways Villas Condominium Ass'n
· 1996-01-03

Bell entered the parties' consent decree, permanently enjoining future Fair Housing Act violations and vacating the earlier dismissal: "It is further ORDERED that this Court’s order and judgment of March 10, 1995 (entered March 13, 1995) 879 F.Supp. 778, shall be vacated." No contested party motion was decided in this writing.

Muller v. United States
· 1992-06-29
Request for taxation of costs (defendant United States) Denied

“For these reasons, the government’s request for reimbursement of costs is denied.”

United States v. Erkard
· 1996-07-25
Summary judgment (plaintiff United States) Granted

“Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, (docket # 9), is hereby granted”

Flemm v. Bowen
· 1988-10-28
Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff Grace Flemm) Denied

“Thus, her motion for payment of attorney fees is denied.”

Perdue v. Northern Can Systems, Inc.
· 1996-01-24
Summary judgment (defendant Northern Can Systems, Inc.) Granted

“Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, (docket # 19), is, therefore, GRANTED.”

Rachel v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
· 1995-04-04
Motion in limine (defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation) Granted in part

“(docket # 19) is granted in part and denied in part.”

Motion in limine (defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation) Granted

“(docket # 24) is granted.”

Muller v. United States Postal Service
· 1992-05-26

After a bench trial, Bell entered judgment for the government because negligence could not be established without speculative stacked inferences: "the court finds in favor of defendant and against plaintiff on the issues presented for resolution." No party motion was decided in this writing.

Johnny's Automatic Transmission v. One 1971 Viking
· 1985-10-10
Summary judgment (defendant National City Bank) Denied

“Therefore, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is hereby denied.”

United States Ex Rel. Woodruff v. Fairways Villas Condominium Ass'n
· 1995-03-09
Motions to dismiss (defendants Fairways Villas Condominium Association and officers) Granted

“Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (docket # 8) is granted.”

Darnell v. Northern Can Systems, Inc.
· 1995-02-22
Summary judgment (defendant Northern Can Systems, Inc.) Granted

“defendant’s motion for summary judgment (docket # 21) is granted.”

In Re Revco, D.S. Inc.
· 1989-04-21
Motion to dismiss appeal (Official Committee of Unsecured Noteholders) Granted

“the Noteholders’ Committee’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing (Docket No. 31) is granted and this appeal is dismissed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The twenty post-commission assigned cases form an archival slice rather than a complete caseload. Civil-rights, product-liability, disability-benefits, prisoner, labor, tax, patent, ERISA, fraud, real-property, and bankruptcy matters were represented.

A historical record

Judge Bell no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.