Robert Bazil Krupansky
Judge Krupansky no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“Since further administrative remedies are available to plaintiff, the Court concludes that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction must be denied and that the action is dismissed without prejudice.”
“Accordingly, defendant’s Motion is denied as it relates to expunction of record and granted in all other respects.”
Krupansky determined that Ohio's Constitution permitted the city to create purchased-power surplus for outside sale within the fifty-percent limit.
“In light of the foregoing, defendant’s Motion to Suppress must be sustained.”
“the motions of Kerr and Church to intervene are hereby granted”
“the motions of Kerr and Church for change of venue are hereby denied”
“the motions of Kerr and Church to dismiss are hereby denied”
“the motions of Kerr and Church for a continuance to permit discovery are hereby denied”
“motions of Kerr and Church for a stay of enforcement are hereby denied”
Krupansky remanded the dischargeability proceeding so the bankruptcy referee could determine in the first instance whether any jury-trial right existed.
“Under the circumstances of this case the motion to file an amended complaint will be granted.”
“The motion will be denied.”
“the motion to amend the complaint by noting Ward as a corporation' is hereby granted.”
“the motion to dismiss this action as to Ward for lack of venue is hereby granted.”
“the motion to strike is granted.”
“Accordingly, the Government’s Motion is granted, and it is ordered that John Brancato, Charles Blank (Charles LNU), Ignatius Brancato and James San Felippo furnish and provide handwriting exemplars to a Special Federal Grand Jury as requested by the Government.”
“Accordingly, the plaintiff’s Motion for Permanent Injunction is denied, and the Complaint is dismissed at plaintiff’s costs.”
“The defendants’ motions being well taken, the complaints are dismissed.”
“Accordingly, the Court finds that defendant, United States of America, is entitled to summary judgment, and it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that summary judgment be entered on behalf of the United States in Cases No. C72143 and C72-144.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
No assigned-case slice was recovered for Krupansky's 1970-1982 district service, so no caseload-mix or case-duration claim is made.
A historical record
Judge Krupansky no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.