James Steven Gwin

United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio district No longer serving Appointed by Bill Clinton (Democratic) 11 signed orders read

Judge Gwin no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Gwin decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

At summary judgment in employment-discrimination cases Gwin parses each theory separately: he denied summary judgment on the plaintiff's federal and state disparate-treatment claims while granting it on a distinct state-law 'gender plus age' theory.

“For the reasons above, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Inverness's summary judgment motion. In particular, the Court DENIES Inverness's motion for summary judgment on Siegel's disparate-treatment claims under federal and state law, except that the Court GRANTS Inverness's motion for summary judgement on Siegel's state-law 'gender plus age' claim.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Scuba v. H.F. Inderlied, Jr.
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, this Court GRANTS Defendant Judge Inderlied's Motion to Dismiss.”

Pate v. Guarantee Trust Life Insurance Co.
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES the Defendant's motion to dismiss.”

Erie Indemnity Co. v. Keurig, Inc. (Simatelex)
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Simatelex's Motion for Summary Judgment.”

Siegel v. Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc.
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“For the reasons above, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Inverness's summary judgment motion. In particular, the Court DENIES Inverness's motion for summary judgment on Siegel's disparate-treatment claims under federal and state law, except that the Court GRANTS Inverness's motion for summary judgement on Siegel's state-law 'gender plus age' claim.”

Savel v. The MetroHealth System
1:22-cv-02154 · 2024-06-26
Motion for voluntary dismissal (plaintiff) Denied

“DENIES Plaintiff Crockett’s motion to dismiss without”

Motion for leave to supplement (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Defendant MetroHealth’s motion for”

Avisar v. Chen
1:23-cv-01980 · 2024-08-20
Motion to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion to amend as futile”

Jurcago v. Commissioner of Social Security
5:23-cv-01187 · 2024-05-30
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“The Court VACATES and REMANDS the Commissioner’s final decision for further proceedings”

Lowe v. ShieldMark, Inc.
1:19-cv-00748 · 2025-05-27
Motion to collect on supersedeas bond (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion and”

Motion for relief from judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“The Court further DENIES Plaintiffs’ Rule 60(b) motion”

United States v. Eaton Corporation
1:23-mc-00037 · 2025-05-30
Motion for reconsideration (respondent) Denied

“the Court DENIES Eaton’s motion for reconsideration”

Trimble v. Bobby
5:10-cv-00149 · 2026-02-25
Motion to authorize counsel (petitioner) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Petitioner’s Doc. 91 motion”

Johnson v. City of Cleveland
1:23-cv-02193 · 2024-05-13
Judgment on the pleadings (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings on all of Plaintiff Johnson’s claims”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 391 days (N = 8).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 93 days (N = 5).

The reviewed 2020 and 2021 filings show a broad docket that included federal criminal cases, False Claims Act litigation, Social Security appeals, wage-and-hour and disability-employment disputes, habeas petitions, international child-abduction proceedings, product liability, admiralty, and civil forfeiture. No magistrate-judge referral appeared in the sampled matters.

A historical record

Judge Gwin no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.