Jack Zouhary

“For all of the above reasons, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 9-11) are granted; Pitts' Motions for Default Judgment (Doc. 13) and Summary Judgment (Doc. 14) are denied.”

“Pitts' Motions for Default Judgment (Doc. 13) and Summary Judgment (Doc. 14) are denied.”

“Based upon the foregoing, this Court finds that injunctive relief is not warranted and denies Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Administrative Action (Doc. 3).”

“This Court adopts the R&R (Doc. 7) and affirms the dismissal of the Petition.”

“Tenneco's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 42) is granted in part and denied in part. The fraudulent-inducement claim is dismissed with prejudice. However, because issues of material fact remain, the breach-of-contract and promissory estoppel claims shall proceed.”

“For the above reasons, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 16) is granted.”

“This Court denies Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on all grounds.”

“Defendant's Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony (Doc. 67) is granted as to Dr. Jonathan Rutchik and Craig Cantrall, and granted in part and denied in part as to Lance Traves.”

“Plaintiffs' Motion for Judicial Notice (Doc. 72) is denied without prejudice.”

“For the many reasons outlined above, Defendants' Motion is granted, and the case is dismissed.”

“For the reasons stated above, summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendants City of Kenton, Chief Vermillion, and Coffman; and also in favor of Defendants Hardin County and Sheriff Everhart pursuant to Monell.”

“Because genuine issues of material fact exist regarding whether the leg sweep was reasonable, this case shall proceed to trial against Defendant Holbrook on the claims under Section 1983 (Count I), intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count III) and assault and battery (Count IV).”

“For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 2) is granted. This case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.”

“the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 40) is granted.”

“The Motion for Additional Discovery (Doc. 41 at 19) is denied; and the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 40) is granted.”

“Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion for Remand is held in abeyance, allowing parties leave until on or before January 19, 2007 to file simultaneous briefs (following the exchange of Rule 26(a) disclosures and limited discovery regarding potential liability of the individual Defendants) for the Court's further consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand.”