Jude Philip Calabrese

How Judge Calabrese rules, drawn from 22 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Position
district
Appointed by
Donald Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
2020-12-03
Education
College of the Holy Cross, B.A. (1993); Harvard Law School, J.D. (2000)
Signed orders read
22

How Judge Calabrese decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He applies Rule 15's liberal amendment policy, granting leave to amend where he discerns no prejudice to the opposing party.

“Under Rule 15's liberal amendment policy, the Court discerns no prejudice that would bar amendment and GRANTS leave for its filing.”

Cautions

Where proposed claims cannot survive, he denies leave to amend as futile and dismisses the deficient counts with prejudice.

“Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion to amend as futile.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Patterson v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Co.
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Defendants' motion to dismiss. Specifically, the Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Counts I, II, III, VI, and IX and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Counts IV, V, VII, and VIII.”

Motion to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion to amend as futile.”

N.D. Ohio No. 5:21-cv-00219 (Diebold/Brinks/Loomis armored-carrier action)
Motion to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“Under Rule 15's liberal amendment policy, the Court discerns no prejudice that would bar amendment and GRANTS leave for its filing.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“As a result of granting leave to amend, Defendant Diebold Inc.'s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 63), Defendant Brinks Company's and Dunbar Armored Inc.'s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 64), and Defendant Loomis Armored, Inc.'s motion for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 67) are DENIED as MOOT, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Jackson v. City of Cleveland
Judgment on pleadings (defendant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES the City of Cleveland's motion for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 38).”

Townsend v. Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Motion to vacate (plaintiff) Denied

“the Court ... DENIES her motion to vacate the judgment (ECF No. 28).”

Ogletree v. Cleveland State University
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Defendant's motion for summary judgment and GRANTS Plaintiff's motion. Further, the Court ISSUES A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT and PERMANENTLY ENJOINS Cleveland State from violating Mr. Ogletree's Fourth Amendment rights as stated in this Amended Opinion and Order.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted
Benedettini Cabinets, L.P. v. Sherwin-Williams Company
Judgment on pleadings (defendant) Granted in part

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Court DISMISSES Count One except as to Karnstein's representation on or about October 10, 2017 and otherwise DENIES the motion.”

United States v. Tenpenny
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Defendant's motion to dismiss.”

Jackson v. Lakemed Leasing, LLC
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 28), GRANTS Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 27), and DISMISSES the action WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Harris v. City of Willoughby
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 4)”

Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“DENIES Plaintiff's motion to reverse judgment (ECF No. 6).”

Metron Nutraceuticals, LLC v. Cook
Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Granted in part

“the Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff's motion for civil contempt and sanctions (ECF No. 99). Specifically, the Court DENIES the motion to the extent it seeks a finding of contempt, but GRANTS Plaintiff's motion for discovery sanctions under Rule 37(b)(2)(A).”

Motion to disqualify (plaintiff) Denied

“the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion for disqualification.”

Anthony v. Murphy
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“as a motion for reconsideration and DENIES that motion”

Bryant v. Stephens
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 406.0 days (N = 26).

  • The sampled 2021-2022 civil docket includes civil-rights and wrongful-conviction claims, prisoner litigation, habeas petitions, racketeering allegations, employment and employee-benefit disputes, contracts, product liability, family-and-medical-leave claims, copyright, and subpoena matters.
  • Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg appears in one sampled referral. The sample is not a complete caseload census.

Draft for Judge Calabrese with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Calabrese, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Calabrese's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace