Christopher Allan Boyko

“For these reasons, the Motion (ECF DKT #107) of Defendant AWP, Inc., d/b/a Area Wide Protective to Dismiss the Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) is granted.”

“The Court grants Take-Two's Motion to Dismiss Hayden's Unjust Enrichment claim because it is preempted by the Copyright Act. The Court also grants Take-Two's Motion to Dismiss Hayden's claim for Declaratory Judgment due to the absence of an actual 'case or controversy' ... Finally, the Court denies Take-Two's Motion to Dismiss Hayden's request for statutory damages and attorney's fees with respect to Hayden's Registered Tattoos depicted in NBA 2K17 and NBA 2K18.”

“This matter is before the Court on Defendant United States of America's Motion to Dismiss (ECF # 10). For the following reasons, the Court grants, in part, Defendant's Motion.”

“for the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Defendant's Motion and dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal is without prejudice subject to refiling a complaint asserting a recognizable cause of action supported with sufficient facts.”

“Because there are genuine issues of fact whether certain deductions were improper -i.e.- cleaning fees, the Court finds summary judgment is improper. Therefore, for the following reasons, the Court denies Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.”

“For the following reasons, the Court grants Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and denies Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.”

“Therefore, the Complaint is barred and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is granted for failure to state a claim and/or for untimeliness.”

“For these reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion (ECF DKT #5) to Remand to State Court is granted and the above-captioned case is returned to Lake County Common Pleas Court.”

“For these reasons, the Motion (ECF DKT #83) of Defendants, Marc J. McNaughton, M.D. and Prime Health, Inc., in Limine to Preclude Testimony or Argument based on Testimony of Dr. Lawrence Mendel is granted. The opinions and testimony of Dr. Mendel are, therefore, excluded.”

“This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Certain Testimony from Plaintiffs’ Designated Expert Witness Cheryl Blume, Ph.D. (ECF # 89). For the following reasons, the Court grants, in part, and denies, in part, Defendants’ Motion.”

“Whirlpool’s motion to exclude the testimony of Todd B. Hilsee (docket no. 294) is GRANTED; ... Plaintiffs’ motion to limit and exclude the testimony of Dr. Timothy Bresnahan (docket nos. 295, 296) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; ... Whirlpool’s motion to exclude the testimony of Dr. David Griffin (docket no. 291) is DENIED;”

“Therefore, for the foregoing reasons, the Court denies Defendant’s Motion.”