Benita Yalonda Pearson

How Judge Pearson rules, drawn from 37 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Position
district
Appointed by
Barack Obama (Democratic)
Commissioned
2010-12-27
Education
Georgetown University, B.S. accounting (1985); Cleveland State University, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, J.D. (1995)
Signed orders read
37

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Dyer v. United States
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12), which has been converted to a Motion for Summary Judgment, is denied in part and granted in part. The Court denies Defendants' Motion as to Plaintiff's FTCA claim because it is not time-barred. The Court hereby dismisses all defendants except for the United States of America.”

TPA Risk Management, LLC v. Buckeye Dealership Consulting, LLC
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Viewing all facts and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 36) is denied.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 44) is granted in part and denied in part.”

Imperial v. Swift Moving Services, LLC
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Consequently, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 34) and Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 41) are denied without prejudice as moot.”

Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Moot / procedural
D'Amico v. Youngstown Film Office
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, Defendant OFO's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9) is granted and Plaintiffs' informal request to amend the Complaint (ECF No. 12) is denied.”

Northfield Park Associates, LLC v. Mancino
5:16-cv-02854 · 2017-02-07
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“For the following reasons, Plaintiff's Motion to Remand is granted.”

Kozak v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
5:22-cv-02018 · 2023-01-25
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (ECF No. 15) and remands the matter to Holmes County Court of Common Pleas.”

Toth v. GSF Mortgage Corp.
5:16-cv-02101 · 2017-06-08
Motion to compel arbitration (defendant) Denied

“Accordingly, Defendants GSF Mortgage Corporation (‘GSF’) and Chad Jampedro's Motion to Compel Arbitration (ECF No. 15) is denied.”

Smith v. Ferrero
5:17-cv-00150 · 2017-06-12
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (ECF Nos. 18, 23, and 25) are granted.”

Judgment on the pleadings (defendant) Granted

“The Canton Judges' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) (ECF No. 28) is also granted.”

Default judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 29) is denied.”

United States v. Trumbull Metropolitan Housing Authority
4:17-cv-00101 · 2018-05-10
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' partial Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 56) is granted.”

Schneider v. Trumbull County Veterans Service Commission
4:22-cv-00126 · 2023-03-14
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“The Court grants summary judgment in favor of Defendant on Plaintiff's Counts I and III, dismissing these federal claims because the Court finds that Defendant does not qualify as an employer under Title VII. The Court denies summary judgment on Plaintiff's Counts II and IV, the state-law claims because there are genuine disputes of material facts regarding these claims.”

Manning v. Lake Hospital System, Inc.
1:20-cv-02734 · 2022-02-09
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendant.”

Boardman Ohio Parents Organization v. Boardman Local Schools
4:21-cv-02184 · 2022-08-25
Judgment on the pleadings (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 9) is granted. The case is hereby dismissed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 244 days (N = 3).

  • The sampled docket includes Social Security appeals, state and immigration-detention habeas matters, federal criminal cases, civil-rights claims, and subpoena proceedings.
  • Judge Pearson sits in the Eastern Division at Youngstown and receives matters from across the district; magistrate judges appear in sampled Social Security referrals.
  • The criminal, Social Security, and habeas-heavy sample does not represent her full civil caseload.

Draft for Judge Pearson with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Pearson, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Pearson's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace