Anna Louise "Ann" Aldrich

United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio district Deceased · served 1980–2010 Appointed by Jimmy Carter (Democratic) 20 signed orders read

Judge Aldrich no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

01 Communique Laboratory, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.
· 2008-03-20
Application for contempt (plaintiff 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc.) Denied

“For the reasons set forth below, the court does not hold Citrix in contempt.”

Gauntner v. Doyle
· 2008-04-29
Summary judgment (defendant Duane L. Doyle) Granted

“For the reasons set forth above, Doyle’s motion to dismiss, as converted to a motion for summary judgment, is granted. (Doc. No. 4.) Accordingly, the Gauntners’ claim is dismissed with prejudice.”

O'NEILL v. Coughlan
· 2006-06-16
Motion to vacate preliminary injunction (defendant Jonathan Coughlan) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the court denies Coughlan’s motion to vacate the preliminary injunction [Docket No. 29].”

Negron v. United States
· 2007-06-04
Summary judgment (defendant United States) Denied

“For the aforementioned reasons, the court denies the Government’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 17), and grants Negron’s motion in part (Doc. No. 18).”

Summary judgment (plaintiff Carol Negron) Granted in part
Nguyen v. City of Cleveland
· 2001-04-04
Motion for reconsideration (defendant Parsons Engineering) Denied

“Therefore, Parsons’s motion for reconsideration is denied.”

Motion for extension of time to appeal (defendant Parsons Engineering) Denied

“Therefore, the Court denies the motion for an extension under Fed. Rule App. P. 4.”

Mooney v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation
· 1999-03-05
Motion for extension of time (plaintiff Mary Elizabeth Mooney) Granted

“The Court grants Mooney an extension of time, denies the defendants’ summary judgment motion (doc. # 47) without prejudice to refiling, and extends the dispositive motion deadline and trial dates in this case.”

Summary judgment (defendants Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Scott Strong) Denied
Ass'n of Cleveland Firefighters, Local 93 v. City of Cleveland
· 2006-03-22
Motions to dismiss (defendants City of Cleveland and Cleveland Civil Service Commission) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants the City’s motion, and dismisses the complaint in its entirety.”

Scott v. Tate
· 2001-02-08
Habeas petition (petitioner Raymond Scott) Denied

“The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is accordingly denied.”

Certificate of appealability (petitioner Raymond Scott) Denied

“The Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), declines to issue a certificate of appealability, as Scott has not made ‘a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.’”

Szalay v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.
· 1996-10-16
Motions to remand (plaintiff Julius Szalay) Denied

“Consequently, the Court has removal jurisdiction over this ease, and Szalay’s motion to remand is denied.”

City of Cleveland v. Woodhill Supply, Inc.
· 2005-08-18
Judgment on the pleadings (defendants Woodhill Supply, Inc. and Arnold Kaufman) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the joint motion of Woodhill Supply and Arnold Kaufman for judgment on the pleadings [doc. no. 41] is granted.”

Carlisle Township Board of Trustees v. Hynolds LLC
· 2004-01-12
Motions to remand (plaintiff Carlisle Township Board of Trustees) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants the Township’s motion for remand.”

Mooney v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation
· 1999-08-27
Summary judgment (defendants Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Scott Strong) Granted

“For the reasons discussed above, this Court grants the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and enters judgment as a matter of law for defendants.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The twenty enumerated assigned cases form an archival slice rather than a complete caseload. Contract, labor, civil-rights, disability-benefits, real-property, product-liability, wage, forfeiture, and other statutory matters were represented.

A historical record

Judge Aldrich no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.