Lisa G. Beckerman

How Judge Beckerman rules, drawn from 21 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Commissioned
February 26, 2021
Education
University of Chicago, A.B.; University of Texas, M.B.A.; Boston University School of Law, J.D.
Signed orders read
21

About Judge Beckerman

Lisa G. Beckerman has served as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Southern District of New York since February 26, 2021. She earned degrees from the University of Chicago, the University of Texas, and Boston University School of Law. Before joining the court, she was a partner in the financial restructuring group at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.

Judge Beckerman's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Beckerman, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Contacting chambers

Request a hearing date from Beckerman’s courtroom deputy by phone or email before filing a motion requiring a hearing.

“All scheduling requests should be directed by telephone or email to Courtroom Deputy Chantel Barrett at (212) 284-4026 or [email protected].”

Filing

Email Chambers an electronic copy of every pleading and its exhibits.

“Electronic copies should be emailed to Chambers at [email protected].”

Motions

Limit moving and responsive briefs to 40 pages and reply briefs to 15 pages unless the court permits otherwise.

“Except as otherwise permitted by the Court, moving and responsive briefs shall be no more than forty (40) pages in length and reply briefs shall be no more than fifteen (15) pages, in each case exclusive of the cover and tables of contents and authorities.”

How Judge Beckerman decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In the McKesson claim dispute, she withheld summary judgment because the allowed amount of the administrative claim remained disputed.

“The allowed amount of McKesson’s administrative claim remains in dispute”

Procedural preferences

In In re Stella Siomkos, she denied a stay pending appeal after finding that the debtor had not carried the heavy burden for staying the turnover order.

“Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that the Debtor has not met her heavy burden of establishing grounds for the Court to stay the turnover order pending her appeal of that order.”

Cautions

In In re Prince Fashions, Inc., she considered whether equitable relief should be exercised, as well as whether the court had power to grant it.

“When deciding whether to exercise its equitable powers under section 105 of the Bankruptcy Code (as defined below), the Court is mindful of what it can do but also considers what it should do.”

In In re JMJ Films, Inc., she found that the debtor had filed in bad faith and dismissed the Chapter 11 case.

“Accordingly, the Court finds that the Debtor’s bankruptcy filing was in bad faith, that section 1112(b)(2) does not apply, and the Chapter 11 case will be dismissed.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re JMJ Films, Inc.
26-10541 · 2026-08-11
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (Gregory F. Holcombe) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court finds that the Debtor’s bankruptcy filing was in bad faith, that section 1112(b)(2) does not apply, and the Chapter 11 case will be dismissed.”

Motion for prefiling injunction (Gregory F. Holcombe) Denied

“With respect to Mr. Holcombe’s request for a ban for two years with respect to a subsequent bankruptcy filing by the Debtor, the Court does not believe that the evidence supports such a ban at this point in time.”

Pravati Capital, LLC v. Balestriere et al. (In re Balestriere)
24-11422; 25-01110 · 2025-11-10
Motion to dismiss adversary proceeding (John G. Balestriere, Balestriere PLLC, and Balestriere Law Firm PLLC) Granted in part

“The MTD is granted in part and denied in part. Counts II through VII of the Complaint are hereby dismissed.”

In re Firstbase.io, Inc.
24-11647 · 2025-11-03
Objection to chapter 11 plan confirmation (Firstbase.io, Inc.) Denied

“For all of these foregoing reasons, the Court overrules the Debtor’s and Novel’s objections to confirmation of the Plan and confirms the Plan.”

Objection to chapter 11 plan confirmation (Novel Capital, Inc.) Denied
Chapter 11 plan confirmation (Harbor Business Compliance Corporation) Granted
Motion to waive confirmation order stay (Harbor Business Compliance Corporation) Denied

“However, the Court will not grant the Plan Proponent’s request for a waiver of the 14-day stay of the confirmation order.”

In re Stella Siomkos
24-10619 · 2025-05-09
Application for surrender and turnover (Albert Togut) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court will grant the Application”

Firstbase.io, Inc. v. Harbor Business Compliance Corporation (In re Firstbase.io, Inc.)
24-11647; 24-04043 · 2025-05-06
Summary judgment (Harbor Business Compliance Corporation) Denied

“Accordingly, the Court denies Defendant’s MSJ.”

Summary judgment (Firstbase.io, Inc.) Granted

“The Court grants Plaintiff’s MSJ.”

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. McKesson Corporation (In re The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.)
15-23007; 17-08264 · 2024-01-18
Summary judgment (McKesson Corporation) Granted in part

“For the reasons set forth in this decision, McKesson’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part.”

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. McKesson Corporation (In re The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.)
15-23007; 17-08264 · 2024-01-18
Summary judgment (McKesson Corporation) Denied

“For the reasons set forth in this decision, McKesson’s Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.”

In re TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V. et al.
23-10385 · 2023-11-20
Motion to dismiss involuntary bankruptcy petitions (TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V. and affiliated alleged debtors) Granted

“The Alleged Debtors’ Motion to Dismiss is granted.”

The Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York v. Ehrenfeld (In re Ehrenfeld)
19-10290; 19-01128 · 2023-06-07
Summary judgment (The Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York) Granted in part

“Plaintiff shall submit an order to the Court granting partial summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff for $50,001 under section 523(a)(4) and otherwise denying the Motion.”

Picard v. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. (In re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC)
08-01789; 10-05351 · 2026-01-28
Motion to dismiss adversary proceeding (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.) Granted

“For the reasons described herein, the Motion is granted. It is hereby ordered that the claims relating to the Newly Alleged Transfers are dismissed from the AC.”

In re Certa Dose, Inc.
21-11045 · 2021-11-04
Motion to transfer bankruptcy venue (COPIC Insurance Company) Denied

“For all of the reasons set forth herein, the Motion is DENIED.”

In re Stella Siomkos
24-10619 · 2025-12-30
Motion to vacate void orders (Stella Siomkos) Denied

“In conclusion, for all of the reasons set forth above, the Court denies the Motion.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

All six sampled matters remained pending in the public metadata. The JMJ Films stream supplied four procedural outcomes and timing for the two outcomes in the reviewed written decision.

Draft for Judge Beckerman with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Beckerman, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Beckerman's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace