Kyu Y. (Mike) Paek

How Judge Paek rules, drawn from 14 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
Position
bankruptcy
Commissioned
2024-07-29
Education
University of Texas at Austin, B.A.; Fordham University School of Law, J.D.
Signed orders read
14

How Judge Paek decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A prior judgment can support nondischargeability at summary judgment when collateral estoppel establishes the required willful-and-malicious injury findings.

“Based on the foregoing, Ms. Quentin is entitled to summary judgment on her section 523(a)(6) nondischargeability claim under the doctrine of collateral estoppel.”

A bad-faith filing supported both retroactive annulment of the automatic stay and dismissal of the bankruptcy case.

“the Court has already concluded that the Debtor filed this bankruptcy in bad faith. For the same reasons, the Court finds that ‘cause’ exists to dismiss this case.”

Procedural preferences

An unauthorized sur-reply was struck rather than considered as part of the summary-judgment record.

“Slowinski’s Motion to Strike Sur-Reply is GRANTED;”

Cautions

A claimed irreparable injury did not justify a stay where the movant showed no likelihood of success and the other factors weighed strongly against relief.

“Where ‘likelihood of success [is] totally lacking, the aggregate assessment of the factors bearing on issuance of a stay pending appeal cannot possibly support a stay.’”

Civil contempt requires clear and convincing proof that the opposing party violated a court order.

“the Debtor has failed to meet his burden of presenting ‘clear and convincing’ proof that LAK3 issued a TY 2019 1099 to the Debtor.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Estate of Angela D. Simpson-Manigault
25-35500 · 2026-08-13
Motion for stay pending appeal (Estate of Angela D. Simpson-Manigault) Denied

“For the reasons set forth herein, the Objection is SUSTAINED, and the Motion is DENIED.”

Radiance Capital Receivables Twelve LLC v. Campbell (In re Campbell)
23-35668; 24-09009 · 2026-01-12
Summary judgment (John F. Campbell) Granted in part

“as to Count I, the Debtor Motion is GRANTED, and Count I is DISMISSED;”

Summary judgment (Radiance Capital Receivables Twelve LLC) Granted in part

“as to Count II, the Radiance Capital Motion is GRANTED to the extent of concluding that any sanction issued by the Alabama District Court based on the Debtor’s violations of the Charging Orders is nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6);”

In re Teresa Vanessa Morton
24-35311 · 2025-12-01
Objection to proof of claim (Teresa Vanessa Morton) Denied

“the Debtor’s request to disallow the POC pursuant to FAPA is DENIED;”

Motion to avoid lien (Teresa Vanessa Morton) Denied

“the Debtor’s request to avoid non-Mortgage liens on the Property is DENIED.”

Objection to proof of claim (Teresa Vanessa Morton) Granted in part

“U.S. Bank’s POC is hereby REDUCED from $308,640.90 to $296,039.41;”

Slowinski v. Garriga (In re Garriga)
24-35345; 24-09014 · 2025-10-07
Summary judgment (Timothy Slowinski) Granted in part

“Slowinski’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART as follows:”

Motion to strike sur reply (Timothy Slowinski) Granted

“Slowinski’s Motion to Strike Sur-Reply is GRANTED;”

Abramson v. Wilson (In re Wilson)
24-36204; 25-09003 · 2025-07-08
Motion to dismiss adversary proceeding (Joseph Wilson) Denied

“the Debtor’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED,”

Summary judgment (Michelle R. Abramson) Granted

“Abramson’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.”

Curtis-Shanley v. United States Department of Education (In re Curtis-Shanley)
23-22314; 23-07020 · 2025-05-08
Summary judgment (United States Department of Education) Granted

“the DOE Motion is GRANTED,”

Summary judgment (Iain Curtis-Shanley) Denied

“the Debtor Motion is DENIED.”

In re Edwin Pabon
24-36071 · 2025-03-04
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (Thomas C. Frost, Chapter 13 trustee) Granted

“the Trustee Motion is GRANTED;”

Motion for relief from stay (Rushmore Servicing for U.S. Bank National Association) Moot / procedural

“the Creditor Motion is denied as moot;”

In re Sean M. Dunn
18-36566 · 2025-08-11
Motion in limine (LAK3, LLC) Granted

“ORDERED that LAK3’s Motion in Limine is GRANTED;”

Motion for civil contempt (Sean M. Dunn) Denied

“the Debtor’s Contempt Motion is DENIED.”

In re 7 Merriewold LLC
26-35163 · 2026-06-22
Motion to annul automatic stay (U.S. Bank Trust National Association) Granted

“the Motion to Annul Stay is GRANTED,”

Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (U.S. Bank Trust National Association) Granted

“The Motion to Dismiss is also GRANTED.”

Quentin v. Knox (In re Knox)
22-22958; 23-07012 · 2026-06-30
Summary judgment (Beverly Quentin) Granted

“the Summary Judgment Motion is GRANTED,”

Motion to stay discovery (Grannell E. Knox, Sr.) Moot / procedural

“The Motion to Stay Discovery is DENIED as moot.”

In re Slavko Perez Duzdevich
25-35268 · 2026-04-22
Motion to avoid judicial liens (Slavko Perez Duzdevich) Denied

“it is ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.”

In re Alexander Mancone
18-36018 · 2026-02-18
Motion to reopen bankruptcy case (Alexander Mancone) Denied

“the Motion to Reopen is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

All six sampled matters remained pending in the public metadata. The Simpson-Manigault stream supplied a filing-fee ruling and timing for the reviewed stay decision.

Draft for Judge Paek with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Paek, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Paek's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace