Edward J. Ryan

How Judge Ryan rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Ryan no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
Position
bankruptcy
Status
No longer serving
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Ryan decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

An official committee could retain counsel to pursue available state-law remedies despite objections about insolvency and plan timing.

“This court will not preclude the equity committee from resorting to all available legal remedies”

Procedural preferences

Chapter 11 could not substitute for an appeal bond or provide collateral review of adverse state-court judgments.

“This court should not, and will not, act as a substitute for a supersedeas bond of state court proceedings.”

Cautions

A creditor examination could reach the facts and circumstances surrounding a disputed guaranty rather than stopping at the document's face.

“Inquiry into the validity of the disputed claim for $1,600,000 held by Parker Brothers should not be limited solely to inspection of the face of the guarantee”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re 343 East 43rd Street Holding Corporation
· 1985-02-13
Motion to modify automatic stay (United Nations Development Corporation) Granted

“UNDC’s motion to modify the automatic stay to allow disposition of the motion for discovery in the civil action, S.D.N.Y., 84 Civ. 2650, is granted.”

In re Ladycliff College
· 1985-02-04
Motion to expunge claim (Ladycliff College) Granted in part

“the debtor’s motion to expunge Marine Midland’s claim should be granted to the extent of post-petition interest and denied as to expenses and attorneys’ fees.”

In re Jones
· 1984-06-13
Motion to change venue (P. Barry Jones) Denied

“Accordingly, the motion to change venue is denied.”

Motion to appoint operating trustee (Chapter 11 trustee) Granted

“an operating trustee should be appointed by the United States Trustee.”

In re Saxon Industries
· 1984-05-01
Application to retain special counsel (Official equity security holders’ committee) Granted

“the motion of the equity committee to retain special counsel is granted.”

In re Arkin-Medo, Inc.
· 1984-11-07
Motion for relief from rule 2004 order (Parker Brothers) Denied

“The motion for relief of Parker Brothers from the order is therefore denied.”

In re Onio’s Italian Restaurant Corp.
· 1984-09-21
Motion for relief from automatic stay (Vinellis, Inc.) Denied

“The motion to vacate the stay is denied without prejudice pending the outcome of the litigation in the Civil Court of the City of New York.”

TN Communications Corp. v. Adwar Video Corp. (In re Adwar Video Corp.)
· 1984-04-10
Application for administrative expense (T.N. Communications Corporation) Denied

“Both motions must be, and hereby are, denied.”

Motion to reject lease nunc pro tunc (Adwar Video Corp.) Denied
In re First Hartford Corporation
· 1985-02-15
Application to revoke confirmation order (Crocker Commercial Services, Inc.) Denied

“Revocation of the order of confirmation with its obvious drastic consequences is not appropriate in this case.”

Matter of Onyx Records, Inc.
· 1984-08-03
Motion to dismiss case (Onyx Records, Inc.) Granted

“the motion to dismiss the Chapter 7 petition is granted.”

Plapinger v. Outlet Co. (In re United Department Stores, Inc.)
· 1984-05-03
Motion to dismiss complaint (Outlet Company) Granted

“The above captioned adversary proceeding must be, and hereby is, dismissed.”

In re Iota Industries, Inc.
· 1984-09-12
Motion to determine claim distribution (Michael D. Bray) Granted in part

“the Iota proof of claim should be distributed by the trustee to Armstrong and Bray on an equal basis.”

Fox & Co. v. Saxon Industries, Inc. (In re Saxon Industries, Inc.)
· 1984-09-25
Motion for relief from automatic stay (Fox & Company) Granted

“The stay is therefore modified to permit Fox to counterclaim in”

A historical record

Judge Ryan no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.