Thérèse Wiley Dancks

How Judge Dancks rules, drawn from 13 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Dancks no longer sits on this court. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of New York
Position
Magistrate judge
Status
Retired
Commissioned
February 1, 2012
Education
Le Moyne College (B.A., magna cum laude, 1985); Syracuse University College of Law (J.D., cum laude, 1991)
Signed orders read
13

About Judge Dancks

Thérèse Wiley Dancks served as a United States Magistrate Judge for the Northern District of New York from 2012 until her retirement in February 2026. She was the first woman to hold a magistrate judgeship in the district and later served as Chief Magistrate Judge. She earned her law degree from Syracuse University College of Law and practiced in Syracuse before joining the bench.

How Judge Dancks decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Brenda M. P. v. Commissioner, Dancks recommended sentence-four remand because the ALJ had not adequately explained the step-three Listing conclusion; the district court adopted that recommendation.

“ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 14) is GRANTED ... this matter is REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)”

Procedural preferences

In Maldonado v. Mandalaywala, Dancks recommended denying summary judgment without prejudice as to Bennett because a factual dispute over grievance availability required a hearing; the district court adopted that recommendation.

“ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 46) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART”

In Miller v. Catholic Charities, Dancks recommended sua sponte dismissal without prejudice and with leave to amend for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; the district court adopted the recommendation.

“Chief United States Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks' Report-Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be sua sponte dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. ... the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in its entirety”

Cautions

In April S. v. Commissioner, Dancks recommended affirming the benefits denial. The district court adopted her recommendation and affirmed the Commissioner’s decision.

“ORDERS that Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 14) is GRANTED ... the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

April S. v. Commissioner of Social Security
5:23-cv-00899-MAD-TWD · 2024-09-13
Motion for judgment on pleadings (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 12) is DENIED”

Motion for judgment on pleadings (defendant) Granted

“ORDERS that Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 14) is GRANTED ... the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED”

Miller v. Catholic Charities
5:24-cv-00040-GTS-TWD · 2024-05-06
Screening or sua sponte dismissal recommendation (court) Granted

“Chief United States Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks' Report-Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be sua sponte dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. ... the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in its entirety”

Brenda M. P. v. Commissioner of Social Security
6:23-cv-01121-MAD-TWD · 2025-03-26
Motion for judgment on pleadings (plaintiff) Granted

“ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 14) is GRANTED ... this matter is REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)”

Motion for judgment on pleadings (defendant) Denied

“ORDERS that Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 16) is DENIED”

Dubuque v. Nowicki
9:13-cv-01032-GTS-TWD · 2015-06-24
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Dancks' Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 26) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety ... Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 22) is GRANTED”

Maldonado v. Mandalaywala (MTD)
9:17-cv-01303-BKS-TWD · 2019-01-08
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 24) is DENIED”

Maldonado v. Mandalaywala (MSJ)
9:17-cv-01303-BKS-TWD · 2020-03-10
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 46) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART”

Sorrentino v. Tierney
9:23-cv-00582-LEK-TWD · 2025-03-18
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“the motion for summary judgment and partial motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 25, is DENIED”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied
Jerri T.-W. v. Commissioner of Social Security
5:23-cv-01494 · 2025-06-09
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff benefits be AFFIRMED.”

Kenneth R. D. v. Commissioner of Social Security
5:24-cv-00911 · 2025-06-02
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings.”

Tina M. v. Commissioner of Social Security
1:24-cv-00571 · 2025-09-02
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 11) be GRANTED, Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 17) be DENIED, and the Commissioner's determination be REVERSED and REMANDED.”

Lord v. Bisignano
3:24-cv-01539 · 2025-08-12
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“Commissioner's decision is REVERSED on consent under sentence four of 42 U.S. C.§ 405(g) and REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings.”

Werkheiser v. Jackson
3:22-cv-00073 · 2025-07-30
Motions to compel (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERED that Plaintiff's letter motion, Dkt. Nos. 218, 224, is denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Dancks's sampled civil docket is dominated by Social Security disability appeals, alongside a substantial criminal-duty workload involving warrants, complaints, and misdemeanor matters. The duration figures cover fourteen terminated Social Security cases filed from January through May 2020 and measure filing to termination, not the time taken to decide a motion.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202501
Mar 202501
Sep 202431
Mar 202401
Sep 202301
Mar 202300
Sep 202202
Mar 202202
Sep 202101
Mar 202101
Sep 202001

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

A historical record

Judge Dancks no longer sits on this court. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.