Norman A. Mordue

How Judge Mordue rules, drawn from 5 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Mordue no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of New York
Position
District judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1998–2022
Appointed by
Bill Clinton (Democratic)
Commissioned
October 22, 1998
Education
Syracuse University, B.A. (Economics), 1966; Syracuse University College of Law, J.D., 1971
Signed orders read
5

About Judge Mordue

Norman A. Mordue was a judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. Appointed by President William J. Clinton, Judge Mordue received a commission on October 22, 1998. Judge Mordue assumed senior status on June 30, 2013 and served until death on December 29, 2022.

How Judge Mordue decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

In Rella v. New York State Office of Mental Health, he deferred the defendant’s argument about what a decision maker knew until summary judgment because the plaintiff could not be expected to plead that knowledge at the dismissal stage.

“Defendant’s argument is better suited for summary judgment since it would be difficult at this stage for Plaintiff to say what Ms. Olivadese knew, or when.”

In Vance v. ACCO Brands, he rejected a retaliation theory at summary judgment because the plaintiff’s own belief that the employer intended retaliation did not supply evidence of pretext.

“Plaintiff believes that ACCO intended to retaliate against him by criticizing his work, however, his own personal belief is insufficient.”

In Burke v. New Venture Gear, Inc., Judge Mordue construed the pro se complaint liberally but dismissed the claims against an individual supervisor because Title VII imposed no individual liability and the other asserted theories failed.

“Courts read pro se papers liberally, interpreting them 'to raise the strongest arguments that they suggest.'”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Burke v. New Venture Gear, Inc., et al.
5:04-cv-01430-NAM-GHL · 2005-12-14
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that the motion by defendant Jesse H. Hall to dismiss all claims against him pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is granted.”

Walker v. Syracuse Police Department, et al.
5:01-cv-00069-NAM-DEP · 2005-12-09
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs' claim for unlawful or illegal entry is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the infant plaintiff's claims for failure to file a notice of claim is GRANTED without prejudice”

Motion for leave (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERED, that plaintiffs' cross-motion for leave to file a later notice of claim is DENIED.”

Delarosa v. United States, et al.
1:11-cv-00368-NAM-CFH · 2013-08-26
Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that the motion (Dkt. No. 31) is denied with prejudice insofar as it seeks reconsideration, and denied without prejudice insofar as it seeks summary judgment”

Summary judgment (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Accordingly, the Court denies the Government’s summary judgment motion without prejudice.”

Vance v. ACCO Brands USA, LLC
3:11-cv-01443-NAM-DEP · 2015-03-31
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that defendant's motion (Dkt. No. 55) for summary judgment dismissing the action is granted; and it is further ... ORDERED that the action is dismissed with prejudice.”

Rella v. New York State Office of Mental Health
6:19-cv-00723-NAM-ATB · 2020-02-26
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 7) is DENIED”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

  • Mordue's late-tenure docket sample (he went senior in 2013 and died in 2022) is dominated by numerous 2022 copyright actions brought by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, generally resolved within two to four months, and administrative miscellaneous matters involving receiverships, subpoena or summons enforcement, and judgment registration, most resolved the same day or within days.
  • Substantive merits matters, including land-condemnation, employment, and Section 1983 cases, were a minority of the sample.
  • Observed nature-of-suit categories included copyright and Natural Gas Act land condemnation.
  • Referred magistrate judges included Andrew T.
  • Baxter, David Peebles, Daniel J.
  • Stewart, and George H. Lowe.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202300
Sep 202224
Mar 202202
Sep 202106
Mar 202105
Sep 202015

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

A historical record

Judge Mordue no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.