Miroslav Lovric

“Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 12) is GRANTED, Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 13) is DENIED, Defendant's decision denying Plaintiff disability benefits is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED”

“Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 13) is DENIED”

“ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 10) is GRANTED ... the Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four”

“ORDERS that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 12) is DENIED”

“Dugan's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 106) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Dugan is DISMISSED as a defendant herein”

“Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 28) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment medical indifference claim against Kinter and DENIED as to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment excessive force claim against Newell and Baker”

“ORDERS that Defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, Dkt. No. 38, is DENIED”

“ORDERS that Defendant's motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 41, is GRANTED”

“ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 23) is GRANTED; ... ORDERS that Plaintiff's amended complaint (Dkt. No. 38) is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and with leave to replead”

“Defendants’ motion is granted”

“cross-motion for summary judgment is denied”

“ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery (Dkt. No. 149) and motion to defer consideration of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED;”

“Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 12) is GRANTED.”

“Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 17) is DENIED.”

“Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 11) is GRANTED.”

“Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 16) is DENIED.”

Initial-review screening Order & Report-Recommendation (28 U.S.C. 1915(e)) in a pro se civil-rights action. IFP application granted; recommended that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend for failure to state a claim (no plausible state-action or constitutional violation against a mall, its manager, security guard, or state troopers). Recommendation only; district-judge adoption not yet verifiable. Verbatim: “RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and WITH LEAVE TO AMEND for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”

Initial-review screening Order & Report-Recommendation (28 U.S.C. 1915(e)) in a pro se civil-rights action arising from an arrest for trespass. Amended IFP application granted; recommended that the complaint be accepted in part (a Fourth Amendment false-arrest claim against Deputy Costa in his individual capacity) and dismissed in part (unreasonable-search and other false-arrest claims dismissed with leave to replead; official-capacity and malicious-prosecution claims dismissed without leave). Recommendation only; adoption not yet verifiable. Verbatim: complaint recommended to be accepted to the extent it “asserts a false arrest claim pursuant to the Fourth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendant Costa in his individual capacity; and (2) DISMISSED (a) with leave to replead” in part and “without leave to replead” as to official-capacity and “malicious prosecution claims.”

Consolidated initial-review screening Order & Report-Recommendation (28 U.S.C. 1915(e)) across three related pro se actions (lead case Hamza v. Kotsidis, 1:25-CV-0968). IFP applications granted and the three cases consolidated; plaintiff's motions for a preservation order, expedited discovery, and a court conference denied without prejudice; recommended that the operative complaints be dismissed without prejudice but without leave to replead as frivolous and for failure to state a claim / seeking relief from immune defendants. Recommendation only; adoption not yet verifiable. Verbatim: “RECOMMENDED that the Court DISMISS WITHOUT PREDJUCIE BUT WITHOUT LEAVE TO REPLEAD” the pleadings “as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).”