Mae A. D'Agostino

United States District Court for the Northern District of New York district Appointed by Barack Obama (Democratic) 16 signed orders read

How Judge D'Agostino decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Scrutinizes removal jurisdiction and grants remand where the removing defendant cannot establish the amount in controversy from the face of the complaint (excluding costs, interest, and attorney's fees).

“Plaintiff's motion to remand is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that this action is REMANDED to New York State Supreme Court, Oneida County”

Procedural preferences

Refers prisoner and pro se civil-rights matters to a magistrate judge and, where no party objects, adopts the report and recommendation on clear-error review, entering the recommended disposition such as summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

“ORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 31) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety”

Cautions

Enforces sovereign-immunity and jurisdictional limits at the threshold: a 42 U.S.C. 1983 damages suit against a state agency is barred by the Eleventh Amendment, and such claims are dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, though often without prejudice and with leave to replead a proper defendant.

“ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 23) is GRANTED; ... ORDERS that Plaintiff's amended complaint (Dkt. No. 38) is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and with leave to replead”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Capuano v. NYS DOCCS
9:23-cv-01556-MAD-ML · 2025-03-24
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 23) is GRANTED; ... ORDERS that Plaintiff's amended complaint (Dkt. No. 38) is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and with leave to replead”

Parson v. Farmer
9:14-cv-01268-MAD-ATB · 2016-06-15
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 31) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety”

Bank v. New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets
5:21-cv-00642-MAD-ATB · 2022-04-26
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration and clarification (Dkt. No. 42) is DENIED”

Thomas v. Leifeld
9:13-cv-00321-MAD-TWD · 2018-07-12
Motion in limine (defendant) Granted in part

“ORDERS Defendants' motion in limine (Dkt. No. 116) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

Motion in limine (plaintiff) Granted in part

“ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion in limine (Dkt. No. 123) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

Smith v. Perlman
9:11-cv-00020-MAD-CFH · 2014-03-13
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 73) is DENIED”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' cross motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 81) is GRANTED”

Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 79) is DENIED”

DiFillippo v. Special Metals Corporation
6:13-cv-00215-MAD-ATB · 2014-03-26
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 17) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

Motion to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff's motion to amend her complaint (Dkt. No. 21) is GRANTED”

Salamone v. Douglas Marine Corporation
1:19-cv-01213-MAD-DJS · 2022-01-12
Motion to set aside judgment (defendant) Denied

“Defendant's motion to set aside the amended judgment (Dkt. No. 99) is DENIED”

Frierson v. Troy City School District Board of Education
1:17-cv-00044-MAD-CFH · 2018-06-08
Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Ahern's motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 48) of the Court's March 15, 2018 Memorandum-Decision and Order (Dkt. No. 45) is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendant Ahern is hereby DISMISSED as a party”

King v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
6:25-cv-00345-MAD-TWD · 2025-06-13
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff's motion to remand is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that this action is REMANDED to New York State Supreme Court, Oneida County”

Capuano v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
9:23-CV-1556 · 2025-03-24
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 23) is GRANTED”

Doe v. Rees
3:24-CV-00274 · 2026-03-09
Default judgment (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 71) is DENIED as moot”

Sciocchetti v. Village of Menands
1:24-CV-878 · 2026-07-02
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 34) is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 266 days (N = 18).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 177 days (N = 3).

The reviewed 2019 filings cover a varied civil docket, including personal-injury and product-liability disputes, consumer-finance claims, copyright, employee benefits, Social Security appeals, prisoner civil-rights and habeas matters, employment cases, and removed state enforcement actions. Several long-running environmental product-liability matters remained pending during the review period.

Put Judge D'Agostino's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge D'Agostino actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge D'Agostino's own signed orders and cites them.