Brenda K. Sannes

How Judge Sannes rules, drawn from 24 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of New York
Position
District judge
Appointed by
Barack Obama (Democratic)
Commissioned
November 21, 2014
Education
Carleton College, B.A. magna cum laude (1980); University of Wisconsin Law School, J.D. magna cum laude (1983)
Signed orders read
24

About Judge Sannes

Brenda Kay Sannes is a judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. Appointed by President Barack Obama, Judge Sannes received a commission on November 21, 2014.

Judge Sannes's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Sannes's own (checked October 9, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Sannes decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

In Cook, Sannes remanded after finding the defendant’s notice of removal outside the statutory thirty-day window.

“the Court finds Defendant’s July 7, 2026, Notice of Removal was filed outside the thirty-day period prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b).”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Madonia v. Moore
6:21-cv-00069-BKS-TWD · 2022-02-24
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 22) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

M.O. v. Orendorf (County of Onondaga)
5:25-cv-00125-BKS-TWD · 2025-11-06
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that the County's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 16) is DENIED”

Sturgen v. Garland
8:22-cv-00049-BKS-DJS · 2024-09-09
Summary judgment (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 25) is DENIED without prejudice to renewal”

Green v. Haimes
9:18-cv-00703-BKS-ATB · 2019-07-02
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 29) is DENIED”

Maldonado v. Mandalaywala (MTD)
9:17-cv-01303-BKS-TWD · 2019-01-08
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 24) is DENIED”

Maldonado v. Mandalaywala (MSJ)
9:17-cv-01303-BKS-TWD · 2020-03-10
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 46) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART”

Rizzuto v. Annucci
9:23-cv-00515-BKS-PJE · 2025-09-25
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 30) is GRANTED as to ... and ... DENIED as to ... and those claims will proceed to trial, pursuant to the order of Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on September 25, 2025”

Cayuga Nation v. Parker
5:22-cv-00128-BKS-TWD · 2025-12-01
Motion in limine (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that evidence that the Nation lost profits in connection with the sale of cannabis products is precluded as irrelevant”

Jones v. Agata
9:23-cv-00720-BKS-PJE · 2025-08-29
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that Defendants' cross-motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 52) is DENIED in its entirety”

Santos v. Schroeder
9:19-cv-01610-BKS-TWD · 2023-09-27
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 99) is GRANTED”

DeJean v. Roth
9:14-cv-00445-BKS-ATB · 2016-10-24
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 94) is GRANTED”

Sims v. CSX Transportation Inc.
1:16-cv-00762-BKS-TWD · 2017-09-06

FELA / Federal Safety Appliances Act / Locomotive Inspection Act personal-injury suit by a pro se railroad engineer. After plaintiff's counsel withdrew (unable to contact plaintiff) and plaintiff failed to comply with court orders or keep a current address on file, Magistrate Judge Dancks recommended dismissal under Rule 41(b). No objections were filed (the mailing was returned undeliverable); Judge Sannes reviewed for clear error and adopted the recommendation, dismissing the complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The order resolved no pending party motion and is recorded as a procedural disposition rather than a merits ruling.

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 240.5 days (N = 20).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 223 days (N = 6).

  • 2019 tenure cohort is dominated by pro se prisoner 42:1983 civil-rights cases (Jones/Agee/Clay/Lev/Bowman/Wilder v. Cuomo et al.), plus employment civil-rights (ADA, ERISA, FMLA, Title VII), diversity product-liability/personal-injury (NutriBullet, Jo-Ann Stores), IDEA/education (SG, Diederich), Social Security appeals (Watson), and contract/insurance/CERCLA-environmental (Albany Molecular, Penn Mfrs, MPM Silicones).
  • N.D.N.Y. routes most civil cases through referral magistrates.
  • Referral magistrate judges who recur on these dockets include Christian F.
  • Hummel, Andrew T. Baxter, Daniel J.
  • Stewart, Therese Wiley Dancks, David Peebles, Miroslav Lovric, Randolph F.
  • Treece.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months2
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years11
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 2026211
Sep 2025010
Mar 2025310
Sep 2024113
Mar 2024922
Sep 2023018
Mar 2023018
Sep 2022220
Mar 2022017
Sep 2021223
Mar 2021427
Sep 2020022

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, not for Judge Sannes: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed1,3028.4 months
Closed with no court action2274.2 months
Closed before pretrial7967.4 months
Closed during or after pretrial26717.2 months
Closed during trial1253.8 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20251,3028.4 months
Sep 20241,3937.7 months
Sep 20231,2497.9 months
Sep 20221,44412 months
Sep 20211,12010.2 months
Sep 20201,1958.6 months
Sep 20191,1879 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Sannes with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Sannes, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Sannes's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace