Patrick G. Radel

How Judge Radel rules, drawn from 17 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of New York
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Signed orders read
17

About Judge Radel

Patrick G. Radel serves as a U.S. bankruptcy judge for the Northern District of New York. His signed decisions are available in the court’s published opinion archive.

Judge Radel's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Radel, as published on the court's website (checked October 11, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Filing

Judge Radel requires paper chambers copies only when the court specifically requests them.

“Paper chambers copies are not required, unless specifically requested by the Court.”

Motions

File the applicable adjournment request form electronically by 2:00 p.m. the day before a hearing before Judge Radel.

“An adjournment request shall be made by electronically filing not later than 2:00 p.m. the day prior to the hearing one of the following forms:”

Conferences

For a video appearance before Judge Radel, register by 3:00 p.m. one business day before the hearing.

“by video via Teams, for which pre-registration is required by 3:00 PM one business day before the hearing.”

Trial

Trials and evidentiary hearings before Judge Radel require in-person appearances unless otherwise ordered.

“Unless otherwise ordered, all counsel, parties, and witnesses must appear in person at an evidentiary hearing and trial before Judge Radel.”

Trial

Contact Judge Radel’s chambers in advance before offering exhibits or demonstratives at a hearing.

“A party who intends to offer exhibits or use any demonstratives at a hearing, pursuant to Local Rule 7040-1, shall contact chambers in advance for permission and further instruction.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 11, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Radel decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Default judgment was supported by an unexplained failure to answer, the absence of a meritorious defense, and prejudice from prolonged delay.

“The Debtor failed to move to set aside the default that was entered on December 5, 2025, and failed to put forth a sufficient reason why they never responded.”

Procedural preferences

In Rodriquez v. Delamater, Radel granted dismissal in part and allowed amendment in part, permitting the fraud theory to proceed while rejecting the willful-injury theory.

“The Court grants Defendant-Debtor’s motion to dismiss (Docket No. 48), in part, and grants Plaintiff’s request to amend his complaint, in part (Docket No. 57).”

Cautions

Using the automatic stay to halt pending litigation does not by itself establish bad faith warranting dismissal.

“The fact that the Debtor is utilizing the protections of the Bankruptcy Code does not indicate bad faith.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Kashyap v. Jolly (In re Jolly)
25-10646; 25-90023 · 2026-08-20
Default judgment (Sumeet and Anjali Kashyap) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED.”

Rodriquez v. Delamater (In re Delamater)
25-10872; 25-90017 · 2026-08-24
Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (Robin Delamater) Granted in part

“The Court grants Defendant-Debtor’s motion to dismiss (Docket No. 48), in part, and grants Plaintiff’s request to amend his complaint, in part (Docket No. 57).”

Motion for leave to amend complaint (Aurelio N. Rodriquez) Granted in part
In re Amber R. Burbach
25-60526 · 2026-08-24
Objection to claim (Amber R. Burbach) Granted in part

“Debtor’s objection to Home Loan’s Claim (Docket No. 25) is GRANTED in part as stated herein. The remainder of the objection is DENIED.”

In re Jeffrey S. Davidson
23-11130; 26-10156 · 2026-08-24
Motion to convert chapter 7 case (Jeffrey S. Davidson) Denied

“Debtor’s Conversion Motion (Ch7 Docket No. 58) is DENIED for the reasons stated herein.”

Motion to dismiss chapter 13 case (John B. Carnett IV) Granted

“Mr. Carnett’s Ch13 Dismissal Motion is GRANTED (Ch13 Docket No. 19) for the reasons stated herein.”

In re Joseph Edward Hyson Jr.
23-10219 · 2026-08-20
Motion to enforce automatic stay (Joseph Edward Hyson Jr.) Denied

“Hyson’s Motion to Enforce is (Docket No. 155) is DENIED as stated herein.”

Motion for preservation and turnover (Joseph Edward Hyson Jr.) Granted

“Hyson’s Preservation Motion is GRANTED (Docket No. 136) as stated herein.”

Kashyap v. Jolly (In re Jacqueline Kamau Jolly)
25-10659; 25-90024 · 2026-08-20
Default judgment (Sumeet and Anjali Kashyap) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED.”

In re Edward B. Scharfenberger
25-11477 · 2026-08-11
Motion to dismiss or convert chapter 11 case (United States Trustee) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the United States Trustee’s Motion to Dismiss or Convert this case (Docket No. 70) is GRANTED and this case is converted to a case under Chapter 7 for cause pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b); the St. Clare’s Pensioners’ motion (Docket No. 66) is DENIED as moot; and the Debtor’s Motion for Suspension of this Case (Docket No. 76) is DENIED.”

Motion to dismiss chapter 11 case (St. Clare's Pensioners) Moot / procedural
Motion to suspend chapter 11 case (Edward B. Scharfenberger) Denied
Koeva v. Jolly (In re Lanford Leroy Jolly)
25-10646; 25-90021 · 2026-08-10
Default judgment (Stela Koeva) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED.”

Rodriquez v. Delamater (In re Delamater)
25-10872; 25-90027 · 2026-08-05
Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (Robin Delamater) Granted in part

“The Court grants Debtor’s motion to dismiss (Docket No. 23) in part and grants Plaintiff’s request to amend his complaint (Docket No. 36) in part.”

Motion for leave to amend complaint (Aurelio N. Rodriquez) Granted in part
In re The Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, New York
23-10244 · 2026-04-30
Motion to authorize group claim (New York Attorney General and St. Clare's Pensioners) Granted

“The Joint Motion to Authorize Group Claim (Docket No. 2518) is GRANTED; the Motion for Order Establishing Claims Bar Date for St. Clare’s Pensioners and Approving the Form and Notice of Claims Bar Date (Docket No. 2516) is DENIED as moot.”

Motion to establish claims bar date (Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany and tort claimants' committee) Moot / procedural
In re Kris Daniel Roglieri
24-10157 · 2026-04-28
Motion for leave to sue bankruptcy trustee (Linda Oliver) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, this Court DENIES Oliver’s Motion. (Docket No. 645).”

In re Timothy T. Trainor
25-11154 · 2026-03-04
Motion to dismiss chapter 7 case (Jean and Kim Ndjango) Denied

“The Ndjangos’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No.12) is DENIED.”

Motion to extend deadline to object to discharge (Jean and Kim Ndjango) Granted

“On December 29, 2025, this Court granted the Ndjangos’ alternative request for an extension of time to file a complaint to determine dischargeability and/or object to discharge.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

All five sampled matters remained pending. One sampled matter supplied an express motion outcome.

Draft for Judge Radel with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Radel, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Radel's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace