Robert E. Grossman

How Judge Grossman rules, drawn from 24 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Grossman no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2025
Served
2008–2025
Commissioned
2008-04-18
Signed orders read
24

How Judge Grossman decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Conversion remained available when the debtor's conduct did not meet the required level of bad faith.

“the Debtor’s conduct does not rise to the requisite level of bad faith and thus the Debtor is eligible to be a debtor under Chapter 11”

A guaranty claim had to receive the same treatment as other unsecured claims once bankruptcy triggered a contractual default.

“the Debtor's plan does not meet the requirements of § 1322(a)(3) because Aspire's unsecured claim is not being given the same treatment as the other unsecured creditors”

Procedural preferences

Post-confirmation claim relief could not undo the discharge and final treatment created by a confirmed plan.

“upon entry of the order confirming the Plan, ITT no longer had a prepetition claim against the Debtor because it was discharged”

A final distribution could not skip senior creditor classes without their consent.

“Absent the consent of a senior class of creditors, the distribution of estate funds may not deviate from the statutory requirements.”

Cautions

A default did not entitle Chapter 7 debtors to strip an otherwise valid junior mortgage lien.

“the Court denies the Debtors’ motion and dismisses the complaint”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Hirsch Electric Co., Inc.
· 2011-10-20
Summary judgment (M. Carl Levine, Morgulas & Forman, P.C., and Jerrold L. Morgulas) Granted

“the Court grants summary judgment in favor of the Defendants”

Desiderio v. Parikh
· 2011-05-24

The court resolved dismissal and discharge objections after a multi-day trial on the debtor's conduct and disclosures.

Sarasota CCM, Inc. v. Kuncman
· 2011-04-12

The creditor failed to prove the debtor's intent to defraud beyond the findings made in the earlier state proceeding.

Pryor v. Fisher
· 2010-04-21
Summary judgment (Chapter 7 Trustee) Denied

“the motion for summary judgment is denied”

In re Malewicz
· 2010-11-04
Motion to determine non debtor tax refund rights (Jay Grotenstein) Granted

“the Non-Debtor Spouse’s Motion is granted”

In re St. James Mechanical, Inc.
· 2010-08-10
Motion to extend claim deadline or deem informal claim (ITT Sheraton Corporation) Denied

“ITT’s Motion is denied”

In re Mortensen
· 2011-01-19
Motion to reopen bankruptcy case (Linda J. Mortensen) Granted

“For the forgoing reasons, the Motion is granted.”

In re Robert Plan Corp.
· 2010-10-26
Application to terminate retirement plan (Chapter 7 Trustee) Granted

“the Trustee’s request for entry of an order authorizing him to terminate the Plan and retain professionals to assist him with his duties as Administrator is granted”

Application to retain professionals (Chapter 7 Trustee) Granted
Application for professional fees (Chapter 7 Trustee) Denied

“The request to authorize and award fees to the professionals is denied pending the filing of fee applications”

Application for interim compensation (Chapter 7 Trustee) Denied

“The Trustee’s request for entry of an order awarding him interim compensation and authorizing the Trustee to take any actions the Trustee deems appropriate to bring the Plan into compliance with the ERISA statutes is also denied.”

Application for plan compliance authority (Chapter 7 Trustee) Denied
In re Almonte
· 2008-12-09
Objection to plan confirmation (Chapter 13 Trustee) Denied

“the Chapter 13 Trustee’s objection to plan confirmation based on the Debtor’s failure to include ‘income’ from credit card cash advances in his ‘projected disposable income’ to be committed to repayment of unsecured creditors is overruled”

Pomilio v. MERS
· 2010-02-23
Default judgment (Thomas and Stephanie Pomilio) Denied

“the Debtors’ motion is denied and the adversary proceeding shall be dismissed”

Kirschenbaum v. Leeds Morelli & Brown P.C.
· 2011-05-05

After trial, the transfers were avoidable but could not be recovered from the remaining law-firm defendant.

In re Agard
· 2011-02-10
Motion for relief from automatic stay (Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.) Granted

“the Court finds that the Motion in this case should be granted”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

All five sampled matters were terminated and every entry stream was empty.

A historical record

Judge Grossman no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.