Louis A. Scarcella

How Judge Scarcella rules, drawn from 21 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York
Position
bankruptcy
Commissioned
2014-05-16
Signed orders read
21

How Judge Scarcella decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

The prospect of returning substantial proceeds to the estate for redistribution to creditors favored reopening the case.

“there is a clear potential benefit to creditors of the Debtor’s estate if the bankruptcy case is reopened.”

Procedural preferences

A counseled party's partial response to summary judgment may support treating undefended claims as abandoned.

“Plaintiffs have abandoned Counts Three and Seven”

Cautions

A proof of claim may fail when the claimant cannot produce documentary or testimonial evidence of a personal right to payment.

“the Court finds that Riley is unable to satisfy his burden of proof in demonstrating that he personally has a ‘right to payment’ and, thus a ‘claim’ against the Debtor individually”

Repeated filings timed to stop foreclosure, without a genuine reorganization purpose, supported dismissal with prejudice.

“this current chapter 11 case was filed in bad faith and must be dismissed with prejudice”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re NRAD Medical Associates, P.C.
15-72898 · 2026-05-29
Motion to reopen bankruptcy case (Former shareholders and creditors of NRAD Medical Associates, P.C.) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the second motion to reopen the Debtor’s bankruptcy case is granted.”

In re Mark Fraser
8-26-71438 · 2026-07-30
Motion for stay violation and sanctions (Mark Fraser) Denied

“For all the foregoing reasons, and for the reasons set forth on the record made at the Hearing, the Debtor’s Motion is denied.”

In re Kyle McEvoy
8-25-70177 · 2026-07-30
Objection to proof of claim (Kyle McEvoy) Granted

“Accordingly, based upon the foregoing, the Debtor’s motion is granted and the Debtor’s objection to POC No. 8-1 is sustained.”

Huebscher v. Bialsky (In re Maidan)
8-19-77027 / 8-23-08017 · 2026-06-30
Summary judgment (Jay Bialsky and related defendants) Granted

“Defendants’ motion is granted.”

Summary judgment (Eric Huebscher and Alexander Talel) Denied

“Defendants’ motion is granted and Plaintiffs’ motion is denied”

In re Stephen Carl Silverberg
8-25-73436 · 2026-04-13
Motion for stay pending appeal (Stephen Carl Silverberg) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Debtor’s motion for a stay pending appeal is denied.”

Landsmanas Stern v. Molina
8-21-70830 / 8-21-08139 · 2025-09-22
Motion to reopen and vacate judgment (Carlos Javier Molina) Denied

“the Defendant’s Rule 60(b) Motion seeking to reopen the Landsmanas Stern Action and to set aside the Settlement Agreement Order and the Judgment pursuant to Rules 60(b)(2), (b)(3) and (b)(6) is denied.”

Motion for sanctions (Carlos Javier Molina) Denied

“The Defendant’s Sanctions Motion seeking to impose sanctions against Mr. Hertzberg is denied.”

Motions to compel (Carlos Javier Molina) Moot / procedural

“The Defendant’s Motion to Compel seeking to compel production by the Plaintiff is denied as moot.”

Motion for sanctions (Jack Landsmanas Stern) Denied

“The Plaintiff’s Sanctions Motion seeking to impose sanctions against the Defendant is denied”

In re Hilary Hamann
25-71986 · 2025-07-28
Motion to dismiss or convert chapter 11 case (United States Trustee) Granted

“ORDERED, that pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b), the Debtor’s chapter 11 case is dismissed”

Anchieta v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
8-23-71283 / 8-23-08026 · 2025-06-24
Motions to dismiss (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, the Court grants Wells Fargo’s motion and dismisses the Complaint in its entirety. The dismissal is with prejudice.”

Default judgment (Julio C. Anchieta) Denied

“Anchieta’s cross-motion for default judgment against Wells Fargo must be denied.”

In re Samra Ali
8-22-73404 · 2024-12-26
Motion to convert chapter 7 to chapter 13 (Samra Ali) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, Debtor’s Motion to Convert this chapter 7 case to a case under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code is denied.”

In re Garrett Bernard Tupper, Jr.
8-24-73979 · 2024-12-20
Motion to dismiss chapter 13 case (Chapter 13 Trustee) Granted

“Based upon the foregoing, the Chapter 13 Trustee’s Motion is granted to the extent provided herein.”

In re Garrett Bernard Tupper, Jr.
8-24-73979 · 2024-12-10
Motion for relief from stay (SN Servicing Corporation) Granted

“For all of the foregoing the reasons and as set forth on the record at the November 21, 2024 hearing, the Motion for relief from the automatic stay is granted.”

Marini v. Adamo (In re Adamo)
14-73640 / 15-8008 · 2016-10-31
Summary judgment (Rocco and Josephine Marini) Granted

“For the reasons set forth above, the Court grants plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Five current sampled matters remained pending. The index records the NRAD case as historically terminated, while the reviewed decision reopened it in May 2026.

Draft for Judge Scarcella with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Scarcella, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Scarcella's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace