Howard D. McKibben

United States District Court for the District of Nevada district Appointed by Ronald Reagan (Republican) 17 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Jason Evan Browne v. Lt. Morris
3:05-cv-00618 · 2007-08-09
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING 50 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendants' mtn for summ jdgmt 36 is GRANTED and plaintiff's mtn for summ jdgmt 41 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/9/07.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Defendants' mtn for summ jdgmt 36 is GRANTED and plaintiff's mtn for summ jdgmt 41 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/9/07.”

Young v. State of Nevada
3:17-cv-00118 · 2019-10-15
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“ORDERED that respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 43) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE as specified herein. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/15/2019.”

Young v. State of Nevada
3:17-cv-00118 · 2020-03-31
Habeas petition (plaintiff) Denied

“The Second Amended Petition (ECF No. 32) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Young is DENIED a Certificate of Appealability. ... Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 3/31/2020.”

Goggin v. Enterprise Leasing Co.-West, LLC
3:17-cv-00238 · 2018-08-23
Summary judgment (Enterprise Leasing Company-West, LLC) Granted

“Therefore, Enterprise's motion is granted.”

Beach v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
· 2013-07-23
Motion for attorney fees (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) Granted in part

“The defendant's motion for attorney's fees and other nontaxable costs (#74) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is DENIED as to the request for expert witness fees and other nontaxable costs. It is GRANTED as to the request for attorney's fees, which are hereby awarded in the amount of $32,754.50.”

Van Pelt v. Skolnik
· 2012-09-21
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted in part

“In accordance with the foregoing, the defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is denied as to the plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim but is granted as to plaintiff's Title VII gender discrimination claim and her First Amendment retaliation claim.”

Western Watersheds Project v. Lueders
· 2015-08-13
Summary judgment (U.S. Bureau of Land Management) Granted

“Accordingly, and based on the foregoing, defendant U.S. Bureau of Land Management's motion for summary judgment (# 54) is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (Western Watersheds Project) Denied

“Plaintiff Western Watershed Project's motion for summary judgment (# 45) is DENIED.”

Griffin v. Benedetti
3:07-cv-00525-HDM-VPC · 2011-03-30
Habeas corpus petition (Samuel Griffin) Denied

“IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus shall be DENIED and that this action shall be DISMISSED with prejudice on the merits.”

Certificate of appealability (Samuel Griffin) Denied

“IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.”

McVay v. Allied World Assurance Co.
· 2014-04-18
Motions to dismiss (Allied World Assurance Co. and York) Granted

“Because the plaintiff has not obtained a judgment against FTDC, she is not a named insured or specific intended beneficiary of the contract, and she has not alleged any acts or representations of the insurer that caused her to act in reliance on them, the defendants' motions to dismiss (#15, #22) are GRANTED.”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's request for leave to amend is DENIED, and this action is hereby DISMISSED.”

Takiguchi v. MRI International, Inc.
· 2014-09-18
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted in part

“In accordance with the foregoing, the Suzuki defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to the fraudulent transfer claim, and such claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Sterling Escrow's motion to dismiss the fraud and § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 claims against it is GRANTED, and said claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. In all other respects, the motions to dismiss (# 161, # 170 & # 171) are DENIED.”

Cloud Foundation v. United States Bureau of Land Management
3:11-cv-00459-HDM-VPC · 2011-07-15
Preliminary injunction (plaintiffs) Denied

“Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction (# 10) is DENIED.”

Animal Protection Institute of America, Inc. v. Hodel
CV-N-85-365-HDM · 1987-07-08
Summary judgment (Animal Protection Institute of America, Inc. and the Fund for Animals, Inc.) Granted

“Therefore, Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (Secretary of the Interior) Denied

“The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

As a long-serving senior judge in Reno, McKibben's reviewed recent docket is heavily weighted toward prisoner motions to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, with occasional criminal matters. Older terminated civil cases include HOA-foreclosure and prisoner civil-rights litigation, although several older case timelines are incomplete.

Put Judge McKibben's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge McKibben actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge McKibben's own signed orders and cites them.