Gloria M. Navarro

United States District Court for the District of Nevada district Appointed by Barack Obama (Democratic) 5 signed orders read

How Judge Navarro decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In insurance-coverage disputes, grants the insurer's Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal where the policy forecloses coverage, mooting alternative motions.

“Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 6), is GRANTED .”

On APA review of an agency immigration determination, grants the petitioner summary judgment where the agency decision cannot be sustained.

“Grants Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28).”

Procedural preferences

In Nevada HOA-foreclosure quiet-title suits, resolves multiple competing summary-judgment motions count-by-count in a single order.

“Plaintiff's Second Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 110), is GRANTED”

Cautions

Denies a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of consumer-fraud claims where the complaint adequately states its theory.

“For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the motion.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Saleh v. Holder
54 F. Supp. 3d 1163 · 2014-09-18
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“the Court Denies Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 27)”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Grants Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28).”

Tarr v. Narconon Fresh Start
72 F. Supp. 3d 1138 · 2014-12-08
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the motion.”

Bank of America, N.A. v. Falcon Point Ass'n
347 F. Supp. 3d 592 · 2018-09-28
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff's Second Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 110), is GRANTED”

Summary judgment (both) Denied

“Plaintiff and SFR's Motions for Partial Summary Judgment, (ECF Nos. 65, 68), are DENIED”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“SFR's Second Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 117), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

Patel v. American National Property & Casualty Co.
367 F. Supp. 3d 1186 · 2019-03-20
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 6), is GRANTED .”

Motion for more definite statement (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Defendant's Motion for a More Definite Statement or to Sever/Bifurcate and to Stay Claims for Bad Faith, (ECF No. 7), is DENIED as moot .”

Estate of Sauceda v. City of North Las Vegas
380 F. Supp. 3d 1068 · 2019-03-30
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The sampled recent docket is dominated by 2026 alien-detainee petitions under 28 U.S.C. 2241, alongside Fair Credit Reporting Act, civil-rights, commercial, and personal-injury matters. Because these recent cases were filed in May and June 2026 and remained pending, they do not support case-duration figures. The historical terminated-case analysis is limited to Tarr v. Narconon Fresh Start.

Put Judge Navarro's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Navarro actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Navarro's own signed orders and cites them.