Mike K. Nakagawa

How Judge Nakagawa rules, drawn from 21 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada
Position
bankruptcy
Commissioned
2006-09-01
Education
University of the Pacific, B.A. in Political Economy, 1977; University of California, Davis School of Law, J.D., 1980
Signed orders read
21

How Judge Nakagawa decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Detailed compliance with professional-compensation disclosure duties matters; explanations offered after prolonged noncompliance did not prevent disgorgement.

“The court strictly construes the disclosure requirements and simply cannot permit extensive delay in filing the compensation application.”

A dismissal theory must account for whether the plaintiff has creditor standing under the operative state-court judgment.

“Because Larson did not have a claim against the Debtor, he was not and still is not a creditor under bankruptcy law.”

Procedural preferences

Privilege claims should identify facts showing why each communication is protected; conclusory log entries were insufficient.

“there simply is not enough information in the Cash Cloud Privilege Log to sustain the privilege claimed for each of the documents withheld.”

Cautions

A stay pending appeal requires concrete proof of likely success and irreparable harm.

“Because T-Shack also has not demonstrated a likelihood of success as to the substantive merits of the Renewed Motion, nor that it will suffer irreparable injury, a stay of the Annulment Order is unwarranted.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re T-Shack, Inc.
22-11197 · 2026-05-21
United states trustee motion for review and return of attorney fees (United States Trustee) Granted

“the Motion for Review and Return of Attorney’s Fees brought by U.S. Trustee ... is, GRANTED.”

In re C.I.I., Inc.
25-10677 · 2026-05-05
Subchapter v trustee motion for disgorgement (Subchapter V trustee) Granted

“the Motion for Disgorgement and Payment of Fees ... is, GRANTED.”

In re Nicolas
25-14606 · 2026-04-17
Motion for leave to file late proof of claim (Ford Motor Credit Company) Granted

“the Motion for Leave to File Proof of Claim After Bar Date ... is, GRANTED.”

In re Thrill Intermediate LLC
25-15714 · 2026-01-08
First lien lenders motion to dismiss chapter 11 cases (Ad Hoc Group of First Lien Lenders) Denied

“the Motion ... for an Order Dismissing the Purported Debtors’ Chapter 11 Cases ... is, DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

In re Thrill Intermediate LLC
25-15714 · 2025-12-31
Motion to employ restructuring adviser and cro (Debtors) Granted

“the Motion ... Authorizing Debtors to ... Employ and Retain Force Ten Partners, LLC ... is, GRANTED.”

In re LV Fortune, LLC
22-13555 · 2026-02-20
Motion to convert chapter 11 to chapter 7 (Larson & Zirzow, LLC) Granted

“the Motion to Convert Chapter 11 Case to Chapter 7 ... is GRANTED.”

In re T-Shack, Inc.
25-11208 · 2026-01-27
Motion for stay pending appeal (T-Shack, Inc.) Denied

“the Motion for Stay Pending Appeal of the Order Annulling the Automatic Stay ... is, DENIED.”

L Makeup Agency and Institute, LLC v. Valencia
24-01070 · 2026-01-22
Motion to dismiss in part amended complaint (Evelyn Valencia) Denied

“the Motion to Dismiss in Part First Amended and Supplemental Complaint ... is, DENIED.”

In re Gilmore
24-14209 · 2026-01-05
Motion for review and disgorgement of attorney fees (Adam J. Gilmore) Denied

“the Amended Motion for Review and Disgorgement of Attorney Fees ... hereby DENIED.”

In re Pegg
24-11955 · 2025-12-30
Emergency motion to vest title to surrendered property (Brandon and Jami Pegg) Denied

“the Emergency Motion to Vest Title to Surrendered Property ... is, DENIED.”

In re Paula
11-10465 · 2025-11-24
Application for payment of unclaimed funds (Specialized Loan Recovery, Inc.) Moot / procedural

“the Application for Payment of Unclaimed Funds ... is treated as withdrawn and therefore DENIED.”

In re Curry
25-10411 · 2025-10-30
Motion to extend time to object to discharge section 727 (Seattle Credit Union) Denied

“An extension of time to object to discharge under 11 U.S.C. §727 is denied”

Motion to extend time to determine dischargeability section 523 (Seattle Credit Union) Granted

“An extension of time to determine dischargeability of debt under 11 U.S.C. §523(a) is granted.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The five oldest exact-name matters were terminated metadata shells with zero archived entries. No docket outcome or latency was inferred.

Draft for Judge Nakagawa with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Nakagawa, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Nakagawa's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace