Gregg W. Zive

How Judge Zive rules, drawn from 16 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Recalled to service
Commissioned
1995-01-23
Education
University of Nevada, B.A. in Journalism, 1967; University of Notre Dame Law School, J.D., magna cum laude, 1973
Signed orders read
16

How Judge Zive decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A Chapter 11 plan should demonstrate feasibility and fair treatment with evidence tied to the statutory confirmation requirements.

“The Plan satisfies the requirements for confirmation set forth in section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code.”

Post-confirmation property can support plan modification when unsecured creditors would otherwise lose the benefit of estate value.

“the Motion to Modify must be granted because the Palm Springs property sales proceeds must be made available for Debtor’s unsecured creditors.”

Procedural preferences

Claim objections require evidence strong enough to rebut the proof of claim's initial validity.

“The objecting party must show facts which would tend ‘to defeat the claim by probative force equal to that of the allegations of the proofs of claim themselves.’”

Cautions

A homestead can be lost when the debtor permanently moves away before filing and uses the property as an investment.

“The Vista Grande homestead was abandoned and did not exist on the date she filed her petition.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Finney
03-51940 · 2006-02-24
Oversecured creditor request for attorney fees (Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation) Granted

“The court finds Chase is entitled to its attorneys fees and costs of $956 pursuant to11 U.S.C. § 506(b).”

In re Shuey
03-52753 · 2005-06-08
Trustee objection to wage exemption (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“the trustee has not met his burden of proving that the exemption is not properly claimed. The exemption is allowed”

Ranger Insurance Co. v. Underwood
04-05254 · 2007-03-21
Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 2 (Ranger Insurance Company) Denied

“the elements that must be proven to obtain a judgment under 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(2) ... have not been satisfied.”

Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 4 (Ranger Insurance Company) Granted

“The elements that must be proven to obtain a judgment under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4) have been satisfied”

Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 6 (Ranger Insurance Company) Denied

“the elements that must be proven to obtain a judgment under 11 U.S.C. §§ ... (6) have not been satisfied.”

Request for additional damages (Ranger Insurance Company) Granted

“Additional damages are hereby awarded in the amount of $52,850.00”

In re Unique Drywall & Stucco, Inc.
04-50046 · 2006-03-10
First and final application for compensation (Debtor's counsel) Granted

“First & Final Application for Compensation ... was approved following a hearing thereon”

In re Mega-C Power Corp.
04-50962 · 2006-02-01
Motion to approve settlement under rule 9019 (Chapter 11 trustee) Granted

“the resolution of the Disputes within the scope of the Settlement Agreement is fair and reasonable and satisfies the standards of Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9019(a)”

In re Inman
05-50723 · 2006-07-24
Petition for automatic stay damages (Christopher and Natalie Inman) Denied

“the court ... hereby DENIES Debtors’ request for sanctions against GNCU.”

In re Greene
05-54727 · 2006-07-27
Creditor objection to homestead exemption (Rena Wells) Granted in part

“the court denies the Objection to Debtor’s Claim of Homestead Exemption ... but is limited to $125,000 pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(p).”

In re Blue Bird Body Co.
06-50026 · 2006-02-15
Motion to approve solicitation procedures (Debtors) Granted

“The expedited Chapter 11 procedures embodied in the Solicitation Procedures ... are appropriate”

Motion to approve disclosure statement (Debtors) Granted

“The Disclosure Statement contains ‘adequate information’”

Motion to confirm chapter 11 plan (Debtors) Granted

“The Plan satisfies the requirements for confirmation set forth in section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code.”

In re Hager
99-32815 · 2006-02-27
Motion to reopen bankruptcy case (Nevada Division of Environmental Protection) Denied

“Therefore, the court denies the Motion to Reopen.”

In re Profit
99-30677 · 2001-10-09
Chapter 13 trustee motion to modify plan (Chapter 13 trustee) Granted

“Trustee’s Motion to Modify is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED”

In re Sagewood Manor Associates LP
96-31624 · 1998-06-30
Motion to confirm chapter 11 plan (Sagewood Manor Associates LP) Granted

“the plan of reorganization is confirmed”

Secured creditor objection to confirmation (Beal Bank, S.S.B.) Denied

“the plan is fair, equitable and does not unfairly discriminate against Beal”

Goldin v. Montana (In re Pegasus Gold Corp.)
00-03033 · 2002-03-29
Montana defendants motion to dismiss (State of Montana defendants) Denied

“Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants, and each of them, are DENIED.”

Spectrum engineering motion to dismiss (Spectrum Engineering, Inc.) Denied

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The five oldest post-appointment matters were terminated metadata shells with zero archived entries. No docket outcome or latency was inferred.

Draft for Judge Zive with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Zive, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Zive's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace