Ramona Villagomez Manglona

“Based on the foregoing, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with PREJUDICE.”

“The Court finds under the 2016 NMIAC, an inmate need not file his grievance within fifteen days of the alleged incident nor wait to receive a 'final decision.' Even if the 2021 NMIAC were applicable, the Court finds that Teregeyo exhausted available administrative remedies. And finally, the Court finds that Teregeyo's grievance sufficiently alerted the DOC of the problem for which he now seeks redress. Therefore, the Court denies Haddy's Motion.”

“Based on the foregoing, the Court DENIES IPI's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 38) the SAC with prejudice because Plaintiff's SAC alleges sufficient facts to plausibly show that IPI discriminated against them and the proposed class of 107 Turkish H-2B workers.”

“For the foregoing reasons ... the Court grants the motion to dismiss in part by dismissing all claims against the Defendant Corporations (first through third, sixth, and seventh causes of action) and the conspiracy claim against Conrad; but denies the Motion in part such that the claims against Conrad in the fourth and fifth causes of action for conversion and unjust enrichment remain.”

“For the reasons set forth above, the Court GRANTS Unicorn's motion for entry of default judgment, but for the lesser amount of $1,712,082, plus attorney's fees and cost, plus post judgment interest at the applicable federal rate.”

“Accordingly, the Court DENIES Manila's motion to disqualify (ECF No. 122), and the Attorney General's motion to intervene (ECF No. 114) is DENIED as MOOT.”

“The conditions Cabrera describes while incarcerated are reprehensible; however, Cabrera's personal circumstances as presented do not rise to the level of extraordinary or compelling reasons to warrant compassionate release. Based on the foregoing, Cabrera's motion for counsel and motion for compassionate release are DENIED.”

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that Wang's motion is untimely pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2255(f)(1) and is therefore DENIED.”

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff Ping Shun summary judgment on its account-stated claim in the amount of $443,900.50 and its breach of contract claim for the spa services agreement, for the total amount of $443,900.50.”

“For the reasons stated, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Default Judgment (ECF No. 16) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b), the Eitel factors, and the Fair Labor Standards Act, see 29 U.S.C. § 216(b).”

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff SPLC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 13) as to its third cause of action for breach of contract, and awards SPLC partial judgment against IPI in the amount of $267,353.00 in damages plus post-judgment interest.”

“For the reasons set forth above, the Clerk shall enter default judgment: 1) against Defendant Md. Jashim Uddin and in favor of Plaintiffs in the amount of $6,745.90, plus attorneys' fees and costs, plus post-judgment interest at the applicable federal rate; and 2) against Defendants JN Saipan CNMI, LLC, Md. Jashim Uddin, and Nasmun Nahar Fatema, jointly and severally, and in favor of Plaintiffs, in the amount of $175,976.45, plus attorneys' fees and costs, plus post-judgment interest at the applicable federal rate.”