Robert H. Jacobvitz

How Judge Jacobvitz rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Mexico
Position
bankruptcy
Commissioned
2009-08-10
Education
University of Colorado, B.A., Phi Beta Kappa, 1975; University of Iowa College of Law, J.D., cum laude, 1979
Signed orders read
25

How Judge Jacobvitz decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A developed service record defeated a claim that a default judgment was void for lack of personal jurisdiction.

“This Court has personal jurisdiction over Mr. Toribio and the Default Judgment entered against him is not void for lack of proper service.”

Back-to-back bankruptcy filings did not establish bad faith when the later filing preserved a lien-avoidance opportunity lost through unexpected case closure.

“Under these circumstances, the Court concludes that Debtor’s filing of the Third Case and Fourth Case was not part of a scheme to delay, hinder, or defraud Creditors.”

Procedural preferences

A state court was the preferred forum for continuing collection against a non-debtor entity after entering the underlying judgment.

“the State Court is the appropriate place for FCM to pursue collection remedies against AutoDoc, a non-debtor co-defendant.”

Cautions

An entity must establish valid authority existing on the petition date; post-petition efforts did not cure the defect.

“What is clear is that Daniel Galvan did not have that authority on June 5, 2025, and that Debtor’s subsequent efforts to demonstrate its authority to file bankruptcy as of the petition date have failed.”

A party relying on medical conditions for an undue-hardship claim risked evidence preclusion if it refused ordered medical discovery.

“If the Court imposes this sanction, Plaintiff will not be able to rely on any medical conditions to support her claim that repayment of the student loan debt will cause her an undue hardship.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Gonzales v. Bechem
25-01003-j · 2026-05-08
Motion to set aside default judgment (Vincente Toribio) Denied

“The Court will enter a separate order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion denying the Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment.”

In re New Mexico Terminal Services, LLC
25-11291-j11 · 2026-03-13
Motion to appoint chapter 11 trustee (Century Bank) Denied

“Based on the foregoing, the Court will deny Century Bank’s Emergency Motion to Appoint Chapter 11 Trustee.”

In re Golden
25-10646-j13 · 2026-03-12
Motion for relief from stay (Kent Thomas and Dolores Quijano Thomas) Denied

“The Court will enter a separate order denying relief from the stay.”

In re Saenz
25-10458-j13 · 2026-02-09
Chapter 13 plan confirmation (Amber Saenz) Denied

“The Court will, therefore, sustain FNB’s objection to confirmation, and deny confirmation of Debtor’s chapter 13 plan, without prejudice to the filing of an amended plan.”

Aguilar v. Twin Pines, LLC
25-01018-j · 2026-02-04
Motions to remand (First Alamogordo Bancorp of Nevada, Inc.) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, the Court will enter an order remanding this adversary proceeding to the State Court.”

In re Las Uvas Valley Dairies
17-12356-j11 · 2025-12-12
Objection to administrative claim (Las Uvas Dairies Liquidating Trust) Denied

“Because the District Court ruled on appeal that the Plan administrative claim bar date did not apply to the County’s claim and this Court has denied the laches defense, the Court will allow the County’s administrative expense claim for 2018 Livestock Taxes in the amount claimed.”

Disciplinary Board v. Lincoln
24-01023-j · 2025-12-10
Motions to remand (Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of New Mexico) Granted in part

“Consistent with this Memorandum Opinion the Court will enter separate orders 1) denying Mr. Lincoln’s Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery and Evidentiary Hearing; and 2) granting the Motion to Remand, in part, and remanding the Disciplinary Proceeding to the Supreme Court for the State of New Mexico.”

In re Zamora
22-10260-j7 · 2025-11-07
Motion to avoid judicial lien (Julie Zamora) Granted

“Based on the foregoing, the Court concludes that Debtor is entitled to avoid DNCU’s judicial lien in its entirety pursuant to § 522(f).”

Trinity Legacy Consortium, LLC v. New Mexico Financial & Family Law, P.C.
25-01041-j · 2025-10-30
Claim to void writ of garnishment (Trinity Legacy Consortium, LLC) Denied

“ORDERED FURTHER, that the request in Count I of the Complaint for the Court to determine that the Writ of Garnishment is void for lack of jurisdiction is DENIED.”

In re McCune
20-12326-j7 · 2025-10-08
Motion to compel discovery (Estate of Thomas W. Kuehn) Granted in part

“WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Compel is GRANTED, in part, as follows:”

McCutcheon v. Davide
25-01002-j · 2025-10-07
Summary judgment (Brian McCutcheon) Denied

“For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum Opinion, the Court will enter an order denying the Summary Judgment Motion without prejudice.”

In re Riddle
23-10827-j7 · 2025-08-15
Motion to sell estate asset (Chapter 7 Trustee) Granted

“Because Rainier and Wais are the only objecting parties and they do not have the Right to be Heard on their Objection to the Motion to Sell, the Court will grant the Motion.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

All five sampled matters were recorded as terminated, with a median recorded duration of 98 days. Their public entry streams contained zero retained entries, so no motion result or latency was inferred.

Draft for Judge Jacobvitz with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Jacobvitz, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Jacobvitz's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace