Madeline Cox Arleo
How Judge Arleo rules, drawn from 10 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
How Judge Arleo decides
Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
What persuades
At the pleading stage she declines to dismiss alternative ERISA section 502(a)(3) equitable claims as duplicative of section 502(a)(1)(B) benefit claims; reformation/rescission availability depends on the totality of circumstances and is premature to resolve on a 12(b)(6) motion, though she signals the duplicative claims can be revisited later.
“several courts in this district and circuit have found that Varity does not establish a bright line rule precluding the assertion of alternative claims under sections 502(a)(1)(B) and 502(a)(3) at the motion to dismiss stage.”
Procedural preferences
Rigorously enforces Article III standing as a threshold issue and applies TransUnion strictly: in a consumer FDCPA case, a plaintiff's confusion, fear, or emotional distress from a misleading letter, without reliance or a concrete downstream consequence, is not an injury in fact, and the absence of standing defeats even a certified class on summary judgment.
“merely receiving a letter from a debt collector that was confusing or misleading . . . does not demonstrate a harm closely related to fraudulent or negligent misrepresentation -- both of which require some form of reliance.”
Will not rule on a default-judgment motion submitted without a supporting brief; expects the movant to specify the causes of action and prove damages, and dismisses the motion without prejudice to refile rather than guessing.
“Absent a brief, it is unclear under which causes of action Plaintiffs move for default judgment. The Motion is DISMISSED without prejudice”
Cautions
Abstains under Colorado River from federal FDCPA/consumer-fraud suits that are collateral attacks on a parallel pending state foreclosure; such suits, if allowed, would 'throw into turmoil' the parties' rights and the comity between courts, and the state court is an adequate forum for the federal claims.
“This district has repeatedly invoked Colorado River to abstain from hearing what amount to collateral attacks on pending state foreclosure actions.”
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“ORDERED that Okonite's motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 57, is DENIED as to Counts Two and Three but GRANTED as to Count Four”
“ORDERED that the Novartis Defendants' motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 62, is DENIED as to Counts Two and Three, DENIED as to Count Four against Novartis, but GRANTED as to Count Four against PSE&G and NRG.”
“Balancing all the factors, the Court finds abstention is warranted in this case. Accordingly, Plaintiff's case is dismissed without prejudice... Defendants' motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 5, is GRANTED.”
“Absent a brief, it is unclear under which causes of action Plaintiffs move for default judgment. The Motion is DISMISSED without prejudice, and Plaintiffs may refile the Motion with a brief”
“Plaintiffs have failed to establish that they have suffered a concrete harm sufficient to establish standing, and therefore the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over their claims. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.”
“Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 131, is DENIED”
“the Motion to Decertify the Class, ECF No. 124, is DENIED AS MOOT.”
“Crippa’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 225, is GRANTED”
“Sotheby’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 241, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”
“Art Lending’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 238, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”
“Art Lending’s Motion in limine, ECF No. 238, is DENIED”
“Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification, ECF No. 51, is GRANTED.”
“ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Enforce Judgment (ECF No. 10.) is GRANTED;”
“ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for a TRO or a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 4) is denied without prejudice for the reasons stated herein; and it is further”
“ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED;”
On statutory screening, the court dismissed the prisoner's official-capacity claims and speedy-trial claims with prejudice, dismissed the remaining individual-capacity claims without prejudice, and allowed thirty days to amend. The dispositive text states: 'the Complaint shall be dismissed as follows.' This was a court-directed screening disposition, not a ruling on a party motion.
Draft for Judge Arleo with the record in hand
Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Arleo, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Grounded in Judge Arleo's own signed orders
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace