Joseph Anthony Greenaway Jr.

How Judge Greenaway rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Greenaway no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
Position
district
Status
Elevated to a higher court
Served
1996–2010
Appointed by
Bill Clinton (Democratic)
Commissioned
1996-07-26
Education
Columbia College, B.A., 1978; Harvard Law School, J.D., 1981
Signed orders read
19

How Judge Greenaway decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

When plaintiffs were allowed to choose any hypothetical facts to demonstrate an alleged plan defect, their inability to produce a valid example supported dismissal.

“They submitted illustrations which do not show the claimed ERISA violations, from which this Court infers that it is beyond doubt that they can prove no set of facts in support of their claims which would entitle them to relief.”

Procedural preferences

Will not convert a pleading motion into summary judgment without first notifying the parties and allowing them to present admissible material.

“However, this Court must first provide notice of its intention to convert the motion and allow an opportunity to submit materials admissible in a summary judgment proceeding or schedule a hearing.”

Cautions

Suppressed evidence when officers forcibly took keys, entered an apartment unlawfully, and obtained coerced consent.

“The officers in this case, by forcibly taking Mr. Santos’ keys, illegally entering his apartment, and coercing Ms. Marrero into signing a consent to search form, acted as though they were above the law. Such conduct will not be countenanced.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Haesler v. Novartis Consumer Health, Inc.
· 2006-04-04
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), is granted, and the Second Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice.”

Ehrich v. B.A.T. Industries P.L.C.
· 1997-05-28
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“defendants’ motion to dismiss Count One (1) of plaintiffs’ complaint (the federal RICO claim), is granted.”

DeGirolamo v. Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane, S.P.A.
· 2001-09-12
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiffs motions for summary judgment against Alitalia and Continental based on 49 U.S.C. § 41310 are DENIED”

Summary judgment (Alitalia and Continental) Granted

“Defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment on this issue are GRANTED”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment against Continental based on the Air Carrier Access Act is GRANTED”

Summary judgment (Continental) Denied

“Continental’s cross-motion on this issue is DENIED”

Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“Defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment on the issue of punitive damages is GRANTED”

Zavala v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
· 2006-08-28
Motions to dismiss (Wal-Mart) Granted

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts One and Two of Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint is granted. Count One and Count Two of the Second Amended Complaint are dismissed with prejudice.”

AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.
· 2004-10-22

The court construed patent claims after a Markman hearing; no grant-or-deny motion disposition was recorded.

Bullock v. Runyon
· 1997-06-02
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“defendant’s motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED.”

Brogan v. United New York Sandy Hook Pilots' Ass'n
· 2002-04-12
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted in part

“this Court DENIES Defendants’ summary judgment motion on the issue of negligence and GRANTS Defendants’ summary judgment motion on the issue of unseaworthiness.”

Bruno v. Hershey Foods Corp.
· 1997-05-27
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“plaintiff Frank Bruno’s complaint against the defendants, Hershey Foods Corporation, Henry Heide, Inc., Henry Heide, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan and Henry Heide, Inc. Pension Plan, is hereby dismissed.”

Orlick v. J.D. Carton & Son, Inc.
· 2001-05-02
Motions to remand (plaintiffs) Denied

“Plaintiffs’ motion to remand this action to the Superi- or Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Morris County is hereby DENIED.”

Motion for attorneys fees (plaintiffs) Moot / procedural

“In light of this Court’s denial of Plaintiffs’ motion, the motion for attorneys’ fees is MOOT.”

Danvers Motor Co., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
· 2002-02-04
Motions to dismiss (Ford Motor Company) Granted

“this Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing, and the complaint is dismissed without prejudice.”

United States v. Spinello
· 2000-05-01
Motion to dismiss indictment (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment is denied.”

IQ Group, Ltd. v. Wiesner Publishing, LLC
· 2006-01-10
Summary judgment (Wiesner Publishing) Granted

“this Court grants Defendant Wiesner’s motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Count 4 of the Complaint, for violations of 17 U.S.C. § 1202”

Summary judgment (IQ Group) Denied

“Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as to violations of 17 U.S.C. § 1202 is denied.”

Summary judgment (Wiesner Publishing) Denied

“Wiesner’s motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiffs maximum entitlement to statutory damages is denied.”

Summary judgment (IQ Group) Denied

“Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on infringement of the copyright on the NSAC ad, and entitlement to statutory damages for any such copyright infringement, is denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The fixed ten-docket sample covered early 2005 filings and included employment, personal-injury, habeas, Social Security, statutory, and miscellaneous matters. Nine streams were empty, so the sample should not be treated as a caseload distribution.

A historical record

Judge Greenaway no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.