James E. Yacos

How Judge Yacos rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Yacos no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Hampshire
Position
bankruptcy
Status
No longer serving
Signed orders read
19

How Judge Yacos decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Plain statutory text controlled whether a non-business individual could use Chapter 11.

“the plain meaning of the pertinent statutes is that non-business debtors can use chapter 11.”

Cautions

The court declined to continue exclusivity where ownership had not committed its own capital while relying on creditor resources.

“equity holders that want to risk other people’s money don’t get very far in this Court.”

A motion to dismiss may fail even in a single-asset dispute when the record supports a potentially feasible reorganization and the court can impose adequate-protection payments and firm plan deadlines.

“The Motion to Dismiss is denied.”

A dispute may require a fuller factual record before summary judgment when novel substantive-consolidation issues turn on contested handling of commingled collateral.

“both of the present motions for summary judgment must be denied and that this matter should proceed to trial.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Mount
· 1985-06-26
Objection to claim of exemption (Bankruptcy trustee) Granted

“ORDERED that the trustee’s objection is sustained and the debtor’s claim of exemption under RSA § 408:2 of the insurance policy in question is denied”

In re Sloan
· 1986-10-29
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (Court, sua sponte) Granted

“This Chapter 13 proceeding, be, and the same hereby is, dismissed as not being a qualified filing by a qualified debtor within the intended scope of Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code.”

In re Martin-Amirault
· 1990-03-08
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (Realty Funding Corporation) Denied

“A hearing was held on February 23, 1990, and on that date I ordered that the motion be denied, but took leave to refine my remarks in an opinion.”

Nashua Trust Co. v. Queen (In re Queen)
· 1990-10-03
Motion for stay pending appeal (Francis Queen) Granted

“There shall be a stay pending an appeal in this case effective immediately and lasting for the duration of the appeal provided the appellant pays the appellee $500.00 on October 12, 1990 and on the 12th of each month thereafter during the course of the appeal.”

In re EUA Power Corp.
· 1991-07-02
Motion to extend exclusivity (EUA Power Corp.) Denied

“Accordingly the debtor’s motion for extension of exclusivity is for all the foregoing reasons denied.”

In re Hospitality Associates of Laurel
· 1997-08-21
Objection to administrative tax claim interest (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“A separate Order sustaining the trustee’s objection to the interest claimed on the chapter 11 administrative tax claim embodied in claim no. 86 shall be entered in accordance with this opinion.”

Objection to administrative tax penalties (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“The objection with regard to the penalties will be overruled.”

Keilig v. Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corp. (In re LaFlamme)
· 1995-10-31
Student loan dischargeability claim (Margaret LaFlamme against Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation) Denied

“Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation d/b/a American Student Assistance as to the portion of the debt owing to them that is deemed nondischargeable, which is $15,000.”

Student loan dischargeability claim (Margaret LaFlamme against Student Loan Marketing Association) Granted

“Judgment is entered for the plaintiff/debtor in regard to defendant Student Loan Marketing Association d/b/a Sallie Mae.”

In re Chandler
· 1997-07-07
Chapter 13 plan confirmation (Chapter 13 debtors) Granted

“A separate Order confirming the plan in accordance with this Opinion shall be entered.”

Dynaco Corp. v. KLA Instruments Corp. (In re Dynaco Corp.)
· 1996-08-30
Motions to dismiss (KLA Instruments Corp.) Granted

“The Court will issue a separate Order and Judgment granting the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint with prejudice.”

Adie v. Adie (In re Adie)
· 1996-06-12
Marital debt nondischargeability claim (Former spouse) Denied

“Accordingly, final judgment will be entered in this adversary proceeding determining that the $4,000 obligation in question is a property settlement obligation in the marital proceeding which is dischargeable under § 523(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code and which has not been rendered non-dischargea-ble under § 523(a)(15) of the Bankruptcy Code.”

In re Fountain
· 1996-07-03
Objection to plan confirmation (Raytheon Employees Federal Credit Union) Granted

“Ray-theon’s objection is sustained”

Chapter 13 plan confirmation (Chapter 13 debtors) Denied

“confirmation of the debtors’ amended chapter 13 plan is denied by separate Order entered contemporaneously herewith.”

McCormack v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (In re McCormack)
· 1996-11-22
Request for punitive damages for stay violation (Paul B. McCormack) Granted

“a separate order will be entered determining that the amount of $10,000 in punitive damages' is appropriate for the egregious conduct of Chase involved in this case as summarized above.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The original five matters were terminated, with a median recorded duration of 1,720 days. Every reviewed stream was empty and supplied no classifiable motion outcome.

A historical record

Judge Yacos no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.