Thomas D. Thalken

How Judge Thalken rules, drawn from 7 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Nebraska
Position
Magistrate judge
Signed orders read
7

About Judge Thalken

Thomas D. Thalken served as a United States magistrate judge in the District of Nebraska, based in Omaha. He handled referred pretrial matters and, with the parties’ consent, presided over civil cases through final judgment.

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Thalken decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In one suppression recommendation, Judge Thalken found probable cause under the totality of the circumstances. The district judge remanded for a supplemental hearing on whether the supporting affidavit had been sworn.

“Judge Thalken concluded that under the totality of the circumstances, using a common sense approach, probable cause existed to issue the search warrant. Judge Thalken concluded that the Confidential Informant ('CI') was reliable, that the omission from the supporting affidavit of the things to be seized or place to be searched was not a material omission, and that the investigator seeking the warrant acted in good faith within the warrant's scope.”

Procedural preferences

In a consent civil case, Judge Thalken granted dismissal without prejudice when the record did not establish federal subject matter jurisdiction.

“The defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 8) is granted.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Bravo
8:13-cr-00138-LSC-TDT · 2013-11-27
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“Judge Thalken therefore recommended that the Motion to Suppress (Filing No. 57) be denied.”

Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. U.S. Bank National Association
8:09-cv-00407-TDT · 2010-10-25

Thalken signed a comprehensive 14-paragraph Rule 26(c) protective order with a Written Assurance exhibit in a commercial insurance and banking dispute. It addressed confidentiality designations, access limits, third-party productions, deposition designations, inadvertent-disclosure clawback, return or destruction after 60 days, and the designating party's burden of proving confidentiality if challenged. The entered protective order did not resolve a contested motion and shows Thalken's civil discovery-management work.

Firoz v. KETV Channel 7
4:06-cv-03281-TDT-PRSE · 2007-04-03
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“The defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 8) is granted.”

Wakehouse v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
8:05-cv-00422-JFB-TDT · 2006-08-01
Motions to compel (defendant) Denied

“Caterpillar Inc.’s motion to compel (Filing No. 63) is denied.”

Motions to compel (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“The plaintiff’s motion to compel (Filing No. 69) is denied, as moot.”

United States v. McGhee
8:09-cr-00031-LSC-MDN · 2009-07-21
Motion to suppress (defendant) Granted

“The Defendant’s motion to suppress (Filing No. 29) is granted.”

United States v. Brye and Hill
8:11-cr-00331-LSC-TDT · 2011-11-29
Motions to compel (defendant) Granted

“Hill’s motion to compel (Filing No. 36) is granted.”

Motion to continue (defendant) Granted

“Hill’s motion for a continuance of trial (Filing No. 36) is granted as to both”

United States v. Reddick
8:13-cr-00326-LSC-TDT · 2013-12-10
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“The Motion to Dismiss Criminal Case (Filing No. 14) filed by Defendant, Pretiss Charles Reddick, Jr., is denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 383 days (N = 13).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 46 days (N = 5).

  • Judge Thalken sat in Omaha and carried a criminal-duty docket (initial appearances, detention, search-warrant and suppression matters) alongside civil pretrial management.
  • A substantial share of his civil work came by the parties' consent under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), under which he presided over employment, ERISA, civil-rights, Federal Employers' Liability Act, product-liability, and commercial-contract cases through final judgment, jury trial, or bench trial. Durations below are filed-to-terminated for the 13 consent civil cases grounded in the motion timeline.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, not for Judge Thalken: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed7345.4 months
Closed with no court action2103 months
Closed before pretrial5066.9 months
Closed during or after pretrial1327.1 months
Closed during trial5not reported
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20257345.4 months
Sep 20245227.8 months
Sep 20234677 months
Sep 20226675.2 months
Sep 20215886.8 months
Sep 20205088 months
Sep 20194928.6 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Thalken with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Thalken, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Thalken's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace