Joseph William Woodrough

How Judge Woodrough rules, drawn from 22 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Woodrough no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Nebraska
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1916–1977
Appointed by
Woodrow Wilson (Democratic)
Commissioned
1916-04-03
Education
Heidelberg University, Germany; Read law (1893)
Signed orders read
22

How Judge Woodrough decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Bernstein, Woodrough sustained a demurrer because criminal liability could not depend on a jury's later view of whether a price was reasonable.

“This expression of the law conforms to my own conclusions, and confirms me in the opinion that the law here in question is void.”

In Heafey, Woodrough treated a family business incorporation as a change of form that produced no taxable gain.

“the substitution of shares of stock in the corporation for the shares in the partnership operated to change the form of the holdings, and not the substance”

Procedural preferences

In Musgrave, Woodrough suppressed evidence because the warrant was issued to an agent outside the class authorized by statute.

“a strict and literal observance of all limitations incorporated in the law concerning the issuance of search warrants is not only in accordance with the historical tradition and spirit of our law”

Cautions

In Smith, Woodrough rejected an attempt to recast state embezzlement and concealment as a federal mail-fraud scheme.

“The courts must scrutinize carefully the substance of the charge as well as the mere form in which it is beclouded”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Bernstein
· 1920-06-08
Demurrer (criminal defendants) Granted

“The demurrer to this count of the indictment must therefore be sustained.”

United States v. Cunningham
45 · 1927-09-28
Motions to dismiss (accused defendant) Granted

“The bill should be dismissed; and it is so ordered.”

Munroe v. United States
1664 · 1925-03-09
Demurrer (United States and revenue collector) Denied

“It is therefore ordered that the demurrers to the petition be overruled”

United States v. One Ford
2058 · 1927-08-25
Government forfeiture claim (United States) Granted

“judgment of condemnation should be entered on the pleadings and the judgment roll of the criminal ease.”

Lienholder objection (automobile lienholder) Denied

“the offer of proof along the line indicated will be excluded.”

Sinjen v. Miller
365 · 1922-06-03
Enemy property return claim (naturalized citizen) Granted

“I find the plaintiff to be a citizen of this country now resident here animo manendi, and entitled to recover whatever property belonging to him is now in the custody of the Alien Property Custodian.”

Shukert v. Allen
1554 · 1924-05-20
Motion for directed verdict (taxpayer plaintiffs) Denied

“I will overrule the motion of plaintiffs”

Motion for directed verdict (United States) Granted

“I will sustain the .request of the government to instruct the jury that the trust in question was a trust created by Gustave E. Shukert in his lifetime, and was intended to take effect in possession and enjoyment at or after his death”

United States v. Musgrave
3168 · 1923-12-03
Motion to suppress (criminal defendants) Granted

“it is ordered that the motion to suppress the evidence obtained under the search warrant be sustained.”

United States v. Washington
4814 · 1927-06-16
Motion for new trial (criminal defendant) Granted

“Let a new trial be granted, and the matter made certain, before she is sent to jail.”

United States v. Lot 29, Block 16, Highland Place, City of Omaha
573 · 1924-03-07
Motions to dismiss (property occupants) Granted

“the petition is dismissed, because the particular provision of the law on which it is based is unconstitutional and void.”

United States v. Updike
651 · 1924-08-15
Tax collection claim (United States) Granted

“it will be ordered that plaintiff have decree against the defendants as prayed.”

United States v. Smith
332 · 1928-12-27
Motion to quash indictment (criminal defendant) Granted

“The indictment should be quashed.”

In re Shepoka
· 1929-04-26
Petition to review referee order (bankruptcy trustee) Denied

“The decision and order of the referee establishing the lien ahead of the trustee in bankruptcy was- right, and is affirmed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No tenure-bounded docket record was available.

A historical record

Judge Woodrough no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.