William A. Hill

How Judge Hill rules, drawn from 15 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Hill no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of North Dakota
Position
bankruptcy
Status
No longer serving
Signed orders read
15

How Judge Hill decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Concrete corroboration mattered when a party challenged the authenticity of a notarized mortgage signature.

“Significantly, a handwriting expert did not testify, and Buchholz admitted that her handwriting is not always the same.”

Procedural preferences

The court resisted merits adjudication before discovery produced a complete evidentiary record.

“without discovery being complete and presentation of all the evidence, this Court cannot make a determination as to the accuracy of the financial statements, Plaintiffs reliance upon those statements, Defendant Deitz’s intent in publishing the financial statements, or Defendant Deitz’s intent and actions related to the conveyance of his assets.”

Cautions

A future undue-hardship inquiry should rest on circumstances near discharge rather than speculation years in advance.

“Any undue hardship determination made at this point in time would be based on a hypothetical state of facts rather than actual circumstances.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In Re Dairy Dozen-Milnor, LLP
· 2010-09-15
Motion for relief from stay (AgStar Financial Services) Denied

“At the hearing, the Court denied AgStar’s motion to lift the automatic stay”

Motion for extended cash collateral order (debtor) Granted

“granted Debt- or’s motion for an extended order authorizing the Debtor’s use of cash collateral.”

Motion to prevent payments to manager (AgStar Financial Services) Denied

“Accordingly, AgStar’s motion to prevent Debtor The Dairy Dozen-Milnor, LLP, from making payments to Prairie Ridge Management, LLC, is in all things, DENIED.”

In Re Passa
· 2010-07-12
Motion for relief from stay (Gate City Bank) Denied

“Based on the foregoing, Gate City Bank’s motion to lift the automatic stay is in all things, DENIED.”

Boaz v. ISM Education Loans (In Re Boaz)
· 2008-04-17
Motions to dismiss (Education Credit Management Corporation and Student Loan Finance Corporation) Granted

“Accordingly, ECMC and SLFC’s motion to dismiss is granted.”

Security First Bank v. Deitz (In Re Deitz)
· 2009-09-01
Motion for partial judgment (Jonathan W. Deitz and Wellness Dimension, P.C.) Denied

“Accordingly, Defendants Jonathan W. Deitz and Wellness Dimension’s motion for partial judgment is DENIED in its entirety”

Motion to compel discovery (Security First Bank) Granted

“Plaintiff Security First Bank’s Motion to Compel Discovery is GRANTED.”

Kaler v. Linne (In Re Linne)
· 2008-12-30
Request to preserve and enforce mortgage (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“Based on the foregoing, the trustee’s request to preserve the mortgage for the benefit of the estate and to find the mortgage enforceable is DENIED.”

Request for equitable mortgage (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“The trustee’s request to find that an equitable mortgage exists is also DENIED.”

Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (debtor and defendants) Granted

“The request by Debtor and Defendants to dismiss the trustee’s complaint is GRANTED.”

Pinks v. Stark (In Re Stark)
· 2009-06-09
Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 2 a (Brian Pinks) Granted

“Based on the foregoing, the debt owed by Defendant Lois Mae Stark to Plaintiff Brian Pinks in the amount of $15,615.00 plus interest is nondischargeable in bankruptcy pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A).”

Kaler v. Huynh (In Re Huynh)
· 2008-08-01
Complaint to deny discharge section 727 a 5 (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“Based on the foregoing, Debtors Dam Huynh and Trinh Duong are DENIED a discharge in bankruptcy pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(5) for failure to adequately explain the loss of assets.”

In Re Morlock
· 2006-01-18
Objection to claimed exemptions (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted in part

“Accordingly, the Objection to Claim of Exemptions filed by Trustee Wagner is sustained in part and overruled in part.”

Kaler v. Harwood State Bank (In Re Bohjanen)
· 2006-04-25
Preference avoidance claim (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“The trustee has failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the transfer of Debtors’ tax refund from Debtors’ savings account to HSB to cover the outstanding balance on Debtors’ tax refund loan was a preferential transfer.”

Roy v. Regional Child Support Enforcement Unit (In Re Roy)
· 2004-07-02
Adversary claim to determine dischargeability (debtors) Denied

“Based on the foregoing, the debt owing to Defendant Regional Child Support Enforcement Unit in the amount of $10,540.00 is nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5)(A) and the Complaint of Plaintiff/Debtors Craig Donald Roy and Lucille Weigel-Roy is in all things DISMISSED.”

Counterclaim for attorneys fees and costs (Regional Child Support Enforcement Unit) Denied

“The counterclaim of Defendant Regional Child Support Enforcement Unit is likewise DISMISSED.”

Area Community Credit Union v. Tyrrell (In Re Tyrrell)
· 2005-11-30
Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 2 b (Area Community Credit Union) Denied

“The Court concludes the credit union failed to prove Anthony Tyrrell had the requisite intent to deceive under section 523(a)(2)(B).”

Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 6 (Area Community Credit Union) Denied

“The credit union’s claim under section 523(a)(6) fails.”

Complaint to deny discharge section 727 a 4 (Area Community Credit Union) Denied

“The credit union’s claim under section 727(a)(4)(A) fails.”

Debtor counterclaim (debtors) Denied

“is without merit and is hereby DISMISSED.”

Valley Memorial Homes v. Hrabik (In Re Hrabik)
· 2005-07-28
Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 4 (Valley Memorial Homes) Granted

“The outstanding obligation owed by Debtor Wayne Arthur Hrabik to Valley Memorial Homes in the amount of $3,941.75 is nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4).”

Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 6 (Valley Memorial Homes) Denied

“It has not done so, and the claim under section 523(a)(6) fails.”

Debtor counterclaim (debtors) Denied

“The counterclaim of Debtors Wayne Arthur Hrabik and Shelly Diann Hrabik is without merit and is hereby DISMISSED.”

A historical record

Judge Hill no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.