Woodrow Wilson Jones

How Judge Jones rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Jones no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1967–2002
Appointed by
Lyndon B. Johnson (Democratic)
Commissioned
1967-06-28
Education
Mars Hill College, A.A. (1934); Wake Forest University School of Law, LL.B. (1937)
Signed orders read
19

How Judge Jones decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Blythe, Jones assigned the insurer the burden of proving that the policy's suicide exclusion applied.

“upon the Company to bring itself within the protection of the suicide clause.”

Procedural preferences

In Farrell, Jones protected internal evaluative material while ordering production of separable factual information.

“denies the Motions to Produce said evaluations in their entirety, but ORDERS the United *387States Government to produce”

Cautions

In Cabe, Jones held that a defendant's counterclaim could not supply the amount required to remove a diversity action.

“a counterclaim, either permissive or compulsory, should not be considered in determining the jurisdictional amount for removal of diversity actions to federal court.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Security Insurance Co. of Hartford, Inc. v. Dickerson, Inc.
· 1967-09-28
Motions to dismiss (insured) Granted

“The Court, in its discretion, grants the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.”

United States v. Southern Railway Co.
· 1967-12-20
Petition for review of bill of costs (railway company) Denied

“the attorney’s docket fee as taxed by the Clerk in this cause is a proper item of costs, and orders the same paid.”

Blythe v. Kanawha Insurance Co.
· 1968-01-31
Claim for policy face value (beneficiary) Denied

“The Court therefore finds that the plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendant only the sum of $141.00, plus interest”

Claim for double indemnity (beneficiary) Denied

“plaintiff’s evidence does not meet the test required of her, that is, to prove accidental death by the preponderance of the evidence, thereby defeating her right to recover on the double indemnity feature of her case.”

Claim for return of premiums (beneficiary) Granted
Singleton v. Anson County Board of Education
· 1968-03-21
Request for temporary restraining order (student plaintiffs) Denied

“plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order should be denied”

Request for injunction (student plaintiffs) Granted

“Defendant shall take immediate, affirmative steps to accomplish substantial faculty desegregation in the system and in each school therein.”

Farrell v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.
· 1969-05-22
Motion to produce (plaintiffs and airline) Granted in part

“denies the Motions to Produce said evaluations in their entirety, but ORDERS the United *387States Government to produce”

Ware v. Finch
· 1970-06-18
Summary judgment (claimant) Denied

“The motion of the plaintiff for summary judgment is therefore denied, and the motion of the defendant for summary judgment is granted.”

Summary judgment (Secretary) Granted
Wike v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
· 1970-06-22
Summary judgment (claimant) Denied

“The motion of the plaintiff for summary judgment is therefore denied, and the motion of the defendant for summary judgment is granted.”

Summary judgment (Secretary) Granted
Brad Ragan, Inc. v. Bandag Inc.
· 1972-02-28
Motions to dismiss (patent owner) Denied

“the court cannot at this time dismiss the action by way of summary judgment.”

Motions to transfer (patent owner) Granted

“this case should be transferred to the Middle District where it could have been instituted originally.”

Bowdach v. Frontierland, Inc.
· 1972-05-15
Summary judgment (third-party defendant) Granted

“The Motion for Summary Judgment should therefore be allowed.”

Cabe v. Pennwalt Corp.
· 1974-02-14
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, be, and the same is hereby allowed”

Garner Lumber Co. v. Randolph E. Valensi, Lange, Inc.
· 1974-05-29
Motion to compel arbitration (defendant seller) Granted

“such arbitration proceed in accordance with the terms of the contracts.”

Motions to stay (defendant seller) Granted

“the proceedings in this action be, and the same are hereby stayed pending arbitration of the controversy existing between the parties”

Rudisill v. Southern Railway Co.
· 1976-02-27
Motions to remand (plaintiffs) Denied

“the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand be, and the same is hereby denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The fixed five-docket sample included contract, disability-benefits, bankruptcy-appeal, and trademark matters. All five cases were terminated, but none had an electronic entry stream, so only case durations and administrative closing categories could be summarized.

A historical record

Judge Jones no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.